Each marker on the ring is one counted review, coloured by its verdict.

Casio

G-Shock DW-5000R

DW-5000R-1A42.3mmquartz$200 list priceAnnounced November 2024

A 2024 re-creation of the first G-Shock, the 1983 DW-5000C, with a stainless steel screw-back case inside a resin bezel and band that copy the original's shape, now made from bio-based resin. Made at Casio's Yamagata factory, it adds an LED backlight and a slightly larger 42.3mm case to the original's square digital layout.

Casio product page

Creator Consensus

Positive

6 reviews: 6 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative. 6 of 6 recommend it.

Every reviewer rates its originality positively, and most single it out as a faithful recreation of the 1983 original. Most also say the steel core gives it a solid, premium feel, the white LED backlight is a real upgrade, and it wears comfortably and compactly. Several note it lacks solar, radio sync and connected features.

Where they differ. Value divides opinion: some reviewers find the premium hard to justify for such basic functions, while one feels the metal core and soft resin earn it.

Most praised

Faithful recreation of the 1983 original5 of 6
- Big E's Reviews Feels the brand got every detail of the original right, including the band.they have nailed this with everything the way the band is madeWatch from 0:37
- Big E's Reviews Notes that apart from size, all the original hallmarks are preserved.all the other Hallmarks are true so it's pretty coolWatch from 2:00
- Brave Beaters Sees it as special for faithfully recreating the basic original, against modern trends.it's simply the most basic G-Shock recreated exactly as it was intendedWatch from 3:20
- Just One More Watch Considers it an excellent watch and a reissue worthy of the 1983 original.a cranking watch and a reissue worthy of the originalWatch from 6:50
- Just One More Watch Appreciates that it keeps the authentic looks alongside modest improvements.while still retaining the authentic looksWatch from 7:20
- Casual Watch Reviews Considers it very true to the original, including the red and yellow colour scheme.they've been very truthful to the original using the red and then yellow color schemeWatch from 6:21
- Casual Watch Reviews Feels it captures the spirit of the first G-Shock while adding modern touches.it captures the essence of that original G-ShockWatch from 6:50
- Majestik Watches Sees it as a deliberate recreation, not a cash-in reprint.It feels like a proper reproduction of the original Spirit.Watch from 5:46
Steel core lends a premium, solid build4 of 6
- Casual Watch Reviews Credits the steel midcase with giving a premium feel.because of that metal case it has a really premium FeWatch from 4:55
- Majestik Watches Build feels premium thanks to the steel core and screw-lock back.The build feels properly premium.Watch from 13:01
- Brave Beaters The heavier case and friendly strap give an impression of solid build quality.gives you the feeling of a consistent wellb built watchWatch from 5:13
- G Caleb L. Enjoys the build quality, weight and resin texture.the build quality and the weight and the texture of the resinWatch from 2:52
Bright white LED backlight is an upgrade4 of 6
- Brave Beaters Appreciates the white LED backlight as a legibility-focused choice.apparently they chose legibilityWatch from 8:07
- Just One More Watch The single LED lights the whole display well.does a really good job of IlluminatingWatch from 4:54
- Casual Watch Reviews Highlights the high-brightness LED as an upgrade for night visibility.a high brightness led to really give maximum visibility in the darkWatch from 3:29
- Majestik Watches Likes the bright white LED backlight with afterglow.It's a bright white LED backlight with that nice afterglow.Watch from 8:12
- Majestik Watches Hold-to-light behaviour makes the backlight more practical.That hold to light feel makes it more practicalWatch from 8:42
Wears comfortably and compactly on the wrist4 of 6
- Big E's Reviews Describes the on-wrist look as perfect on a 7.25-inch wrist.my wrist is 7.25 Ines G Shock PerfectionWatch from 3:53
- Casual Watch Reviews Says it fits most wrists comfortably, with slight strap overhang on a 7.2in wrist.it's comfortable fit for most wristsWatch from 4:27
- Majestik Watches Sits comfortably on the reviewer's 7-inch wrist.On my 7-in wrist, it sits comfortablyWatch from 10:36
- G Caleb L. Finds it comfortable and nicer on the wrist than the GW-5610.sure it feels nicer on the wristWatch from 13:52
- Majestik Watches Feels compact in practice thanks to short lugs, despite 13.1mm thickness.in real life, it was compact because the luck lug is shortWatch from 6:14
Steel core and screw-down back true to original3 of 6
- Big E's Reviews Appreciates the all-steel case and screw-down back as true to the original.the all still case with the screw down back that's how they were originallyWatch from 1:05
- Brave Beaters Values the metal core with screw-in caseback, making it feel heavier and faithful to the original.this one indeed indeed has the iconic metallic core with a screw in case backWatch from 4:15
- Just One More Watch Notes the steel core is true to the 1983 original.this one has a heart made of stainless steel just like the originalWatch from 3:56
Made in Japan at the original factory3 of 6
- Casual Watch Reviews Finds Japan production at the original Yamagata factory fitting for this recreation.very fitting that they went back to recreate the original G-Shock from that factoryWatch from 2:33
- G Caleb L. Enjoys that it comes from the same factory as the original DW-5000C.made in the same Factory that the first original dw5000cWatch from 13:52
- Majestik Watches Values Made in Japan production for collectors.It being made in Japan is a real cherry on top for collectors.Watch from 14:57

Show 13 more

Red and yellow accents look cohesive3 of 6
- Big E's Reviews Finds the red brick-pattern surround especially appealing.see the bricks and this is just totally awesomeWatch from 1:32
- Brave Beaters Considers the multi-coloured composition balanced and cohesive.overall I think the dial is balancedWatch from 6:10
- G Caleb L. Likes the red border line and yellow colour accents.that beautiful red line with the splash of yellowWatch from 3:47
Crisp, refined display printing aids legibility3 of 6
- Brave Beaters Finds the printing clearer, sharper and better contrasted.the printing feels clear sharper and better contrastedWatch from 5:40
- Majestik Watches Considers legibility strong: clean, crisp and quick to read.Legibility is also a strong point. The display is clean, crisp, and easy to read at a glance.Watch from 11:34
- G Caleb L. Finds the thinner display font premium and refined; other models feel bloated by comparison.the thinness of the font feels really really premium and upscaleWatch from 2:52
Alarm flash is a clever touch3 of 6
- Brave Beaters Calls the alarm flash the coolest feature and a plus.this definitely is a plus for this modelWatch from 8:07
- Just One More Watch Likes the unusual touch of the light flashing with the alarm.the beep of the single alarm is accompanied by a flash of that lightWatch from 5:23
- Majestik Watches Values the flash alert for noisy environments.One of the most underrated features on this watch is flash alert.Watch from 8:42
Extra heft feels solid rather than burdensome3 of 6
- Just One More Watch Says 77g is not heavy despite being heavier than a standard model.77 G is still not what I would describe as heavyWatch from 6:21
- Just One More Watch The extra weight isn't noticeable, and the resin adds comfort.you don't really feel the extra 20 gram in the head of the watchWatch from 6:21
- Casual Watch Reviews Finds it lightweight but solid on the wrist.it feels lightweight but very solid on the wristWatch from 4:27
- Majestik Watches Finds the heft pleasant rather than burdensome.Not heavy in an annoying way, but in that this is a proper object way.Watch from 11:04
- Majestik Watches Feels more stable than lightweight resin squares.it feels more stable than the featherweight resin modelsWatch from 11:04
Long battery life without solar fuss2 of 6
- Brave Beaters Likes the absence of solar and the 5-year battery.battery life of 5 years no solar I love itWatch from 8:35
- Majestik Watches Sees the five-year battery and no-fuss ownership as a major advantage.Battery life and no maintenance anxiety is a big pro.Watch from 14:28
Bio-resin strap is soft and flexible2 of 6
- Brave Beaters Finds the bio-resin soft and friendly, closer to FKM rubber than hard resin.bio resin which has a soft texture and it's super friendlyWatch from 4:43
- Brave Beaters Considers the strap comfortable and flexible.the straps are pretty comfortable and flexible tooWatch from 5:13
- G Caleb L. Praises the softness of the resin used.the texture of the resin that they use which is super softWatch from 2:52
Reinforced strap design feels sturdy and deliberate2 of 6
- Brave Beaters Likes the reinforced adjustment-hole pattern, thinking it more interesting and likely more durable.this pattern really makes the strap more interesting and most likely more durableWatch from 7:38
- Majestik Watches Rates the strap excellent: thick, sturdy and secure.Watch from 11:34
- Majestik Watches Finds the ribbed, reinforced design more intentional than basic resin bands.It feels more intentional, more premium, and it matches the whole reissue done properly theme.Watch from 4:20
Easy to wear every day2 of 6
- Casual Watch Reviews Views it as a wearable piece of history suited to everyday use.is a piece of history that you can wear every dayWatch from 6:50
- Majestik Watches Considers it effortless to wear daily.It's the kind of watch you can daily without thinkingWatch from 12:33
Flat bezel edge gives a clean vintage profile2 of 6
- G Caleb L. Likes the clean, flat mono-bevel edge on the bezel.clean flat almost like a mono bevel look on the 5000rWatch from 4:15
- Majestik Watches Finds the flatter bezel gives a cleaner, faithful vintage silhouette.That flatter look makes the face feel more like a faithful reissue than a modern remix.Watch from 3:22
Classic design details still hold up2 of 6
- Brave Beaters Feels the original designers got contrasts, dimensions and small details right.Watch from around 2:50
- G Caleb L. Describes the overall look as a beautiful classic design.a beautiful classic designWatch from 0:30
Busy retro-tech face is captivating1 of 6
- Majestik Watches Enjoys the busy, retro-tech look of the face.It's busy in the best way, like retro tech, not minimalism.Watch from 5:17
- Majestik Watches Keeps staring at the watch because the face looks so cool.I keep catching myself staring at it longer than I should.Watch from 12:03
Metal core and soft resin justify the premium1 of 6
- Just One More Watch Believes the metal core and soft resin justify the premium over a base model.I reckon this one is probably worth the extra for that metal coreWatch from 7:20
Bio-based resin is an environmental improvement1 of 6
- Big E's Reviews Views the switch to bio-based resin as a welcome environmental improvement.the band um is now made of a biobased uh plastic that is more environmentally friendlyWatch from 1:32

Most criticised

Lacks solar, radio sync and connected features3 of 6
- Casual Watch Reviews Points out absence of Bluetooth, atomic timekeeping and world time.we don't have Bluetooth there's no Atomic timekeeping there's no world timeWatch from 3:29
- G Caleb L. Notes it lacks Multiband 6 time synchronisation, unlike the GW models.doesn't have those features and so you won't be able to utilize something like multiband 6Watch from 10:02
- Majestik Watches Lack of Tough Solar and Multiband 6 feels like a step back for GW-5000U users.this can feel like stepping backwards on purposeWatch from 15:53
LCD fades at off-axis viewing angles2 of 6
- Casual Watch Reviews Notices the LCD becomes somewhat translucent depending on viewing angle.there is some translucent depending on the viewing angle of the LCDWatch from 5:22
- G Caleb L. Expects the limited viewing angles to become annoying for owners.stuff like the viewing angles will probably get a little AnnoyingWatch from 13:52
Price is hard to justify for basic functions2 of 6
- G Caleb L. Says the price point won't make much sense to most buyers.the price point won't make too much senseWatch from 13:52
- Majestik Watches Price feels awkward for such a basic function list.the value conversation can get awkwardWatch from 15:25
- Majestik Watches Admits non-heritage buyers could fairly call it overpriced.think it's overpriced for what it does. And you wouldn't be wrong.Watch from 19:15

Open a point to see who said it and jump to that moment in their review.

By aspect

PositiveMixedNegative

How reviewers judged each aspect; one square per reviewer who discussed it
Functionality		Mostly liked
Originality		Praised
Design		Praised
Dial		Mostly liked
Wearability		Praised
Value		Mixed
Case & proportions		Praised
Bracelet & strap		Praised
Finishing & build		Praised
Versatility		Praised
Movement		Divided

Was this consensus useful?

The reviews

6 counted, 1 more for context

Remontoir summarises; the reviewers did the work. Watch and read the originals for the full picture.

Majestik Watches

G-SHOCK DW-5000R Review | The 1983 Legend Reborn (Worth It?)

Video, 21 minHands-on reviewFeb 2026

PositiveRecommends, with caveats

Sees the DW-5000R as a faithful, premium-feeling recreation of the 1983 original, praising its dial, build, strap and wearability. Warns that its basic function set makes it feel pricey for buyers who aren't driven by heritage.

Suits: Heritage-minded square fans wanting the 1983 look and build in a new watch

What they said, point by point

Designpositive: Finds the flatter bezel gives a cleaner, faithful vintage silhouette. 3:22
Enjoys the busy, retro-tech look of the face. 5:17
Keeps staring at the watch because the face looks so cool. 12:03
Dialpositive: Considers legibility strong: clean, crisp and quick to read. 11:34
Finds the display sharp at many viewing angles. 8:12
Appreciates the tiny hidden Japan text as a detail for enthusiasts. 5:17
Likes the bright white LED backlight with afterglow. 8:12
Case & proportionspositive: Feels compact in practice thanks to short lugs, despite 13.1mm thickness. 6:14
Notes buttons are shorter than the original, altering period look but still easy to use. 3:50
Likes the polished steel screw caseback. 4:20
Wearabilitypositive: Sits comfortably on the reviewer's 7-inch wrist. 10:36
Finds the heft pleasant rather than burdensome. 11:04
Feels more stable than lightweight resin squares. 11:04
Bracelet & strappositive: Rates the strap excellent: thick, sturdy and secure. 11:34
Finds the ribbed, reinforced design more intentional than basic resin bands. 4:20
Resin is more rigid and less supple than the GW-5000U strap. 11:34
Functionalitypositive: Hold-to-light behaviour makes the backlight more practical. 8:42
Values the flash alert for noisy environments. 8:42
Likes that the current time stays visible during timer use. 10:07
Only one alarm, unsuitable for those relying on several. 16:22
Movementpositive: Finds the module nails the heritage brief with typical Casio accuracy. 10:07
Sees the five-year battery and no-fuss ownership as a major advantage. 14:28
Lack of Tough Solar and Multiband 6 feels like a step back for GW-5000U users. 15:53
Finishing & buildpositive: Build feels premium thanks to the steel core and screw-lock back. 13:01
Appreciates the engraved caseback and buckle details. 4:48
Originalitypositive: Sees it as a deliberate recreation, not a cash-in reprint. 5:46
Values Made in Japan production for collectors. 14:57
Versatilitypositive: Considers it effortless to wear daily. 12:33
Valuemixed: Price feels awkward for such a basic function list. 15:25
Admits non-heritage buyers could fairly call it overpriced. 19:15
Compared with: Casio G-Shock GW-5000U: GW-5000U has softer strap and modern features; DW-5000R more faithful heritage.
Casio G-Shock DW-5610: DW-5000R display holds up better off-axis.
Casio G-Shock GW-M5610U: GW-M5610U is the sensible best-value daily square.
Casio G-Shock DW-5000C: Recreation is slightly larger but keeps original proportions and look.

Watch on YouTube

Just One More Watch

The Best New Casio In Years..... And I Missed It!

Video, 10 minHands-on reviewFeb 2025

PositiveRecommends, with caveats

Calls it one of the best G-Shock releases in years: a faithful reissue with a satisfying steel core and soft bio-resin. Poor legibility is a drawback, and it may feel too nice to use as a beater, so it suits collectors best.

Suits: G-Shock collectors, especially those with many Square G-Shocks

Disclosure: Brand loaner

What they said, point by point

Designpositive: Considers it an excellent watch and a reissue worthy of the 1983 original. 6:50
Finds it visually almost indistinguishable from the original. 3:00
Originalitypositive: Appreciates that it keeps the authentic looks alongside modest improvements. 7:20
Notes the steel core is true to the 1983 original. 3:56
Dialmixed: The single LED lights the whole display well. 4:54
Says the numerals are not easy to read, a common digital Casio flaw. 6:50
Notes there is no anti-reflective treatment on the crystal. 6:21
Functionalitypositive: Likes the unusual touch of the light flashing with the alarm. 5:23
Notes it has only basic features, with no world time, Bluetooth or radio sync. 4:54
Wearabilitypositive: Says 77g is not heavy despite being heavier than a standard model. 6:21
The extra weight isn't noticeable, and the resin adds comfort. 6:21
Valuepositive: Acknowledges the AUD 350 retail price is not cheap. 6:50
Believes the metal core and soft resin justify the premium over a base model. 7:20
Is reluctant to pay the aftermarket markup of double retail. 1:34
Versatilitymixed: Doubts they would beat it up because it feels too precious. 9:13
Suggests it isn't a G-Shock one would use as a tool watch unless buying two. 9:43
Compared with: Casio G-Shock DW-5600: Heavier with a steel core, and worth the extra over the base model.
Casio W-217H: Recommended instead for anyone who wants an easy-to-read display.
Casio G-Shock DW-5000C (1983 original): Visually the same, with improvements in size and LED.

Watch on YouTube

Brave Beaters

All you need to know about the "Hottest G-Shock of the Moment" DW-5000R-1A Review

Video, 10 minHands-on reviewFeb 2025

PositiveRecommends, with caveats

The reviewer initially doubted the need for another square G-Shock but found the reissue special in its details: sharper dial printing, metal core, soft bio-resin strap and alarm flash. Not essential if you already own a similar square, but a must for G-Shock lovers.

Suits: G-Shock enthusiasts who want the faithful 1983 original

Disclosure: Reviewer owns it

What they said, point by point

Dialpositive: Finds the printing clearer, sharper and better contrasted. 5:40
Considers the multi-coloured composition balanced and cohesive. 6:10
Appreciates the white LED backlight as a legibility-focused choice. 8:07
Case & proportionsmixed: Values the metal core with screw-in caseback, making it feel heavier and faithful to the original. 4:15
Finds the plain polished caseback dull, though faithful to the original. 4:15
Likes the less-engraved white bezel labels, which relate better to the dial accents. 6:39
Bracelet & strappositive: Finds the bio-resin soft and friendly, closer to FKM rubber than hard resin. 4:43
Considers the strap comfortable and flexible. 5:13
Likes the reinforced adjustment-hole pattern, thinking it more interesting and likely more durable. 7:38
Finishing & buildpositive: The heavier case and friendly strap give an impression of solid build quality. 5:13
Designpositive: Notes it can easily be confused with other square G-Shocks in this colourway. 5:13
Feels the original designers got contrasts, dimensions and small details right. ~2:50
Functionalitypositive: Calls the alarm flash the coolest feature and a plus. 8:07
Likes the absence of solar and the 5-year battery. 8:35
Originalitypositive: Sees it as special for faithfully recreating the basic original, against modern trends. 3:20
Initially did not find it distinct from other squares but later saw its value in the details. 0:57
Valuemixed: Weighs the $200 price against around $120 for a regular resin square. 3:48
Notes it is non-limited, so there is no need to overpay. 8:35
Says owners of a similar G-Shock they enjoy don't need this one. 9:03

Watch on YouTube

G Caleb L.

G Shock Square Trifecta - DW5000R, GW5000U, GWM5610 Comparison - EDC Watches

Video, 16 minComparisonJan 2025

PositiveRecommends, with caveats

After about a month with the DW-5000R, the reviewer enjoys its refined feel, soft resin, thin font and classic colours. However, the viewing angles, lack of solar/Multiband 6 and price make it an enthusiast-only pick, with the GW-5610 favoured for most buyers.

Suits: G-Shock enthusiasts who appreciate subtle details and Made in Japan quirks

What they said, point by point

Dialmixed: Finds the thinner display font premium and refined; other models feel bloated by comparison. 2:52
Likes the red border line and yellow colour accents. 3:47
Expects the limited viewing angles to become annoying for owners. 13:52
Designpositive: Describes the overall look as a beautiful classic design. 0:30
Case & proportionspositive: Likes the clean, flat mono-bevel edge on the bezel. 4:15
Finishing & buildpositive: Enjoys the build quality, weight and resin texture. 2:52
Sees a refined touch that sets it apart from the other two. 3:21
Wearabilitypositive: Finds it comfortable and nicer on the wrist than the GW-5610. 13:52
Enjoys that it is subtle and unobtrusive. 14:21
Bracelet & strappositive: Praises the softness of the resin used. 2:52
Movementnegative: Feels the accuracy rating should be tightened to around ±5 seconds a month. 10:02
Functionalitynegative: Notes it lacks Multiband 6 time synchronisation, unlike the GW models. 10:02
Originalitypositive: Enjoys that it comes from the same factory as the original DW-5000C. 13:52
Valuenegative: Says the price point won't make much sense to most buyers. 13:52
Notes street prices are inflated by scarcity and demand. 1:00
Compared with: Casio G-Shock GW-5610: Cheaper yet adds solar and Multiband 6; DW-5000R feels nicer and more refined.
Casio G-Shock GW-5000U: GW-5000U has better viewing angles and solar/Multiband 6; DW-5000R has thinner font.

Watch on YouTube

Casual Watch Reviews

G-SHOCK DW5000R Reviewed - Is the Hype Actually Worth It?

Video, 8 minHands-on reviewJan 2025

Very positiveRecommends

The reviewer sees the DW-5000R as a faithful, well-executed recreation of the original 1983 square G-Shock. The steel midcase adds a premium feel, and $200 is strong value, though functions are basic and the LCD shows odd translucency.

Suits: G-Shock fans and collectors wanting a wearable piece of history

What they said, point by point

Originalitypositive: Considers it very true to the original, including the red and yellow colour scheme. 6:21
Feels it captures the spirit of the first G-Shock while adding modern touches. 6:50
Notes some bezel labelling differs from the original due to the modern module. 6:21
Wearabilitypositive: Finds it lightweight but solid on the wrist. 4:27
Says it fits most wrists comfortably, with slight strap overhang on a 7.2in wrist. 4:27
Notes it feels heavier than a resin-midcase 5600 square. 4:27
Finishing & buildpositive: Credits the steel midcase with giving a premium feel. 4:55
Finds Japan production at the original Yamagata factory fitting for this recreation. 2:33
Functionalitymixed: Notes functions are as basic as the original: time, alarm, timer, stopwatch. 3:29
Points out absence of Bluetooth, atomic timekeeping and world time. 3:29
Considers it as tough as the original G-Shock. 3:58
Dialmixed: Highlights the high-brightness LED as an upgrade for night visibility. 3:29
Notices the LCD becomes somewhat translucent depending on viewing angle. 5:22
Valuepositive: Few remakes of iconic watches are available at this price for worry-free daily wear. 7:18
Versatilitypositive: Views it as a wearable piece of history suited to everyday use. 6:50
Compared with: Casio G-Shock DW-5600: Steel midcase and screw-down caseback feel more premium, though heavier.
Casio G-Shock DW-5000C: Faithful recreation; slightly larger case and different button functions.

Watch on YouTube

Big E's Reviews

G-SHOCK DW5000R-1A Anniversary Square Re-Creation

Video, 4 minHands-on reviewDec 2024

Very positiveRecommends

A brief, enthusiastic look at the DW-5000R. The reviewer considers it a faithful re-creation of the 1984 original, noting only the slightly larger case, and expects strong demand from nostalgic buyers.

Suits: Those who grew up with G-Shocks in the 1980s; a Christmas gift

Disclosure: Retailer stock

What they said, point by point

Originalitypositive: Feels the brand got every detail of the original right, including the band. 0:37
Notes that apart from size, all the original hallmarks are preserved. 2:00
Designpositive: Finds the red brick-pattern surround especially appealing. 1:32
Case & proportionspositive: Appreciates the all-steel case and screw-down back as true to the original. 1:05
Points out it is slightly larger than the 41.6mm original. 2:00
Functionalitypositive: Says the 3576 module is very easy to operate. 1:05
Bracelet & strappositive: Views the switch to bio-based resin as a welcome environmental improvement. 1:32
Wearabilitypositive: Describes the on-wrist look as perfect on a 7.25-inch wrist. 3:53
Compared with: Casio G-Shock DW-5000C (1984 original): Re-creation matches the original's hallmarks but is slightly larger.

Watch on YouTube

Also covered by

The Time Teller

The New Casio G-Shock DW-5000R is Very Important. Here's Why!

Video, 6 minReactionDec 2024

Positive

Excited about the DW-5000R as a 50th-anniversary return of the original 5000 series. The reviewer finds its stainless steel inner case notable and ties the enthusiasm to the reliability they associate with G-Shocks.

Not a review of the watch in hand (news, a guide or a reaction), so it isn't counted.

Low-confidence reading: The target gets only a short segment, largely spec recitation. Most opinions concern G-Shocks generally, and there is no clear evidence of hands-on time with the watch.

What they said, point by point

Originalitypositive: Frames it as the progenitor of the 5600 series and the model that started it all. 1:25
Is excited that the release celebrates G-Shock's and Casio's history. 2:50
Case & proportionspositive: Highlights the steel inner case as the interesting difference from usual resin G-Shocks. 2:21
Compared with: Casio G-Shock DW-5600: Looks like a 5600 but is the original 5000 the 5600 descends from.

Watch on YouTube

Specifications

Reference: DW-5000R-1A
Case: 42.3mm, stainless steel case with bio-based resin bezel
Thickness: 13.1mm
Lug to lug: 48.9mm
Movement: Casio module 3576 (digital quartz) (quartz)
Water resistance: 200m
Crystal: mineral glass
Bracelet or strap: bio-based resin strap
Announced: November 2024
List price (US): $200US$200 per casio.com US product page (Wayback snapshot 2025-01-05, page marked 'NEW 12/2024').

Creator Consensus is built only from what reviewers said. Prices, retailers and any commercial relationship never affect it. How consensus works