Each marker on the ring is one counted review, coloured by its verdict.

Christopher Ward

The Twelve X

C12-41A5D0-T00K0-B041mmautomatic$4,865 list priceAnnounced April 2024

A 41mm titanium version of Christopher Ward's twelve-sided integrated-bracelet sports watch, with an open, skeletonised dial showing the in-house, COSC-certified SH21 automatic and its twin barrels. It was made to mark the calibre's tenth anniversary and the brand's 20th, pairing a Grade 2 titanium case with a Grade 5 bezel and caseback.

Christopher Ward product page

Creator Consensus

Very positive

8 reviews: 8 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative. 8 of 8 recommend it.

Every reviewer comes away positive, and nearly all praise the in-house skeletonised movement and the finishing, which several say rivals far pricier luxury skeletons. Most find the exposed calibre beautiful but concede legibility suffers for it. Several highlight the light, comfortable fit and the clasp micro-adjustment.

Where they differ. The case divides opinion: several reviewers find it slim given the movement and water resistance, while several others note it is noticeably thicker than the standard Twelve. Most consider it good value, though some think rivals offer comparable quality for similar money.

Most praised

Skeletonised calibre is beautiful to look at5 of 8
- aBlogtoWatch Finds the skeletonised bridges intentional and engaging in appearance.looks intentional and engagingRead it in context
- WatchGecko Concedes the SH21 movement is a work of art despite a skeptical stance.I must concede that the sh 21 is a work of artWatch from 1:59
- Chisholm Hunter Considers the in-house movement beautiful to look at, with visible twin barrels.the h21 is a pretty beautiful movement to look atWatch from 6:42
- Oracle of Time Says the movement looks spectacular through both the caseback and the open dial.through the wide open sapphire case back and the dial, the movement looks spectacularWatch from 1:54
- WatchChris Feels the large movement looks as good through the caseback as from the front.it looks equally as good as it does from the frontWatch from 4:30
Careful attention to detail throughout4 of 8
- WatchGecko States the attention to detail cannot be faulted.the level of attention to detail in the 12x simply can't be faultedWatch from 2:26
- The Time Teller Considers the attention to detail undeniable.the attention to detail is undeniableWatch from 2:22
- The Time Teller Ranks the brand highly for build quality and detailing.when you're looking at build quality and attention to detailWatch from 4:18
- WatchChris Believes every detail of the watch has been carefully considered.really every detail has been paid attention toWatch from 9:47
- Harrison Elmore Finds details like bridge treatments, crown guards and crown elegant and luxurious.really feel elegant really feel luxuriousWatch from 4:21
Light and comfortable on the wrist4 of 8
- aBlogtoWatch Was surprised by how light the watch is given its steel-like look.You approach it expecting a heavier watch and are instantly surprised by the lightnessRead it in context
- Harrison Elmore Says it is so light and comfortable it could be worn daily without noticing it.I'd basically never notice that I was wearing itWatch from 5:18
- Harrison Elmore Considers the comfort especially impressive for a relatively large watch.for a relatively large watch I think that's a big complimentWatch from 5:18
- Chisholm Hunter Found it comfortable and pleasant on the wrist with the bracelet.it does wear pretty damn nicelyWatch from 1:27
- The Time Teller Finds the bracelet very comfortable and it doesn't pull arm hair.the bracelet is super comfortable does not pull my hairWatch from 2:22
Clasp micro-adjustment is a welcome upgrade4 of 8
- aBlogtoWatch Finds the 3mm clasp micro-adjustment sufficient for a perfect fit.just enough to dial it in perfectlyRead it in context
- Britt Pearce Calls the added clasp micro-adjustment a huge upgrade.this is huge this is a huge upgradeWatch from 8:44
- Oracle of Time Values the extra 3mm of adjustment for a better fit.it does give you an extra 3 mm of wearabilityWatch from 2:49
- WatchChris Finds the butterfly clasp micro-adjust easy to use and pleasant in feel, akin to high-end brands.it's so easy and it feels really good very easy to doWatch from 6:52
- WatchChris Judges the micro-adjust more elegant than rival implementations on butterfly clasps.not as elegant as this in my opinion I think this is more elegantWatch from 10:43
Finishing rivals pricier luxury skeletons3 of 8
- WatchGecko Likens the watchmaking level to high-end brands like Richard Mille or Hublot at a fraction of the price.it's a level of highend watch making that we associate withWatch from 2:54
- Oracle of Time Sees the watch as proof that the brand can compete with skeletonised luxury sports models from bigger names.this watch really shows what Christopher Ward can doWatch from 3:16
- Britt Pearce Calls the finishing unusually good for the price.unreasonably good finishing for the price pointWatch from 4:21
Looks the equal of far costlier watches3 of 8
- aBlogtoWatch Doubts that similar watches from luxury brands justify their much higher prices.After spending time with the Twelve X, it’s hard for me to think they do.Read it in context
- The Time Teller Argues a bigger brand would charge around $20,000 for a similar watch.this would be you know a $20,000 watch easilyWatch from 4:18
- WatchChris Thinks it could pass for a $10,000–20,000 watch.this looks like a watch that could cost 10 $20,000 in my opinionWatch from 7:22
- WatchChris Finds the watch looks and feels more expensive than it is.a watch that looks way more expensive and feels more expensive than it actually isWatch from 2:06

Show 23 more

Exposed movement is nicely finished3 of 8
- Britt Pearce Finds the exposed movement nicely finished.it is a nicely finished movementWatch from 4:21
- WatchChris Finds the movement very nicely finished.the finishing on the movement which is actually very nicely finishedWatch from 7:51
- Oracle of Time Considers the finishing central and says the movement has never looked better.it's all about the finishing, and the SH21 looks prettier than everWatch from 1:25
Open dial shows the movement at work3 of 8
- The Time Teller Enjoys watching the movement and double barrels through the skeletonised dial.you see those double barrels it is awesomeWatch from 2:22
- The Time Teller Appreciates that the skeletonised dial lets the movement be seen in motion.you can take a look at everything as it movesWatch from 2:22
- Chisholm Hunter Loves seeing the movement's beating heart through the skeletonised dial.you can see the Beating Heart of your watchWatch from 4:48
- Harrison Elmore Enjoys seeing the keyless works and motion works operate through the dial.you can see the setting lever you can see yourself interacting with the motion worksWatch from 6:16
Twin barrels and long power reserve impress3 of 8
- aBlogtoWatch Considers the COSC certification and five-day power reserve impressive specs.the specs here are impressiveRead it in context
- WatchGecko Impressed by the twin barrels and long power reserve.it has twin barrels and a really impressive 120RWatch from 1:59
- The Time Teller Calls the movement outstanding, citing its long power reserve and smooth sweep.first pro the movement is insaneWatch from 1:54
In-house movement is rare at this price3 of 8
- aBlogtoWatch Highlights a truly in-house movement at under $5k.a truly in-house movement at under $5kRead it in context
- WatchChris Cites the engineering, materials and micro-adjust as impressive for under $5,000.a lot of engineering and a lot of work that goes into a watch that cost under $5,000Watch from 8:19
- WatchGecko Says it stands out from affordable skeletons that use fairly standard movements.the problem with so many affordable skeletonized watches is that they use fairly standard movementsWatch from 1:30
Price is fair for what's offered3 of 8
- WatchGecko Acknowledges it is a lot of money but judges the price fair given the specs and effort.huge amount of human effort that's gone into the watch it seems a fair priceWatch from 3:23
- Britt Pearce Considers it still good value given the across-the-board upgrades.it's still good valueWatch from 9:42
- Britt Pearce Believes the watch is appropriately priced, though not for everyone.these are appropriately pricedWatch from 10:12
- Harrison Elmore Considers the price fair for what you get.I think the price is fair for what you're gettingWatch from 4:50
Stacks up well against direct rivals3 of 8
- WatchGecko Says skeleton fans will find nothing better for the money.if you're a skeletonized fan you'll find no better for your moneyWatch from 5:20
- Harrison Elmore Believes it competes well with other designs at around $5,000.for $5,000 I think it does compete quite wellWatch from 4:21
- Oracle of Time Points out that its nearest competitor, the Oris ProPilot X, costs over £2,000 more.which is over £2,000 more expensiveWatch from 3:16
Slim given the movement and water resistance3 of 8
- Chisholm Hunter Finds 12.3mm thickness impressive given the 120-hour power reserve movement.that is pretty damn impressiveWatch from 0:29
- Harrison Elmore Notes the case is relatively thin.Watch from 5:18
- WatchChris Had feared a thick case but feels the brand succeeded in keeping it slim with 100m WR.I think they did it they pulled it offWatch from 9:18
- WatchChris Notes it doesn't look thick on the wrist.that does not look very thick on my wristWatch from 9:18
Integrated bracelet is beautifully finished3 of 8
- Harrison Elmore Considers the integrated bracelet and its finishing the standout feature.I think that is by far the standout featureWatch from 1:56
- Harrison Elmore Finds the bracelet facets beautiful and the fit comfortable.the facets on this bracelet are beautiful it's comfortable it fits so wellWatch from 7:45
- WatchChris Calls the titanium bracelet excellent and beautifully brushed.Christopher Ward bracelet which is excellent everything is brushed beautifullyWatch from 5:57
- WatchChris Recommends choosing the bracelet version over the strap because the bracelet is so good.Get it On The Bracelet buy the strap separately because this bracelet is phenomenalWatch from 8:19
- aBlogtoWatch Appreciates the case chamfer continuing onto the bracelet links.the chamfer of the case is continued onto the bracelet and its linksRead it in context
Won over reviewers wary of skeleton watches3 of 8
- The Time Teller Handling it overturned the reviewer's usual dislike of angular bezels and integrated bracelets.when I got myWatch from 0:00
- Britt Pearce Changed the reviewer's view on openworked watches.this kind of has me rethinking my position on open workWatch from 6:48
- Harrison Elmore Though not usually a skeleton fan, thinks this openworked dial is really well done.I'm not usually someone for skeleton or open worked dials but I think this one is really well doneWatch from 5:47
Striking and handsome overall design3 of 8
- WatchGecko Ultimately calls it a stunning watch.the cw1 12x is a stunning watchWatch from 5:20
- Harrison Elmore Calls the titanium Twelve X a striking design.the Chris Ford 12x here in titanium is a striking designWatch from 1:26
- Harrison Elmore Considers the watch aesthetically gorgeous.I do think aesthetically it is gorgeousWatch from 5:47
- Oracle of Time Calls it a spec-heavy watch that is wonderful to look at.It's a spec monster and it really is a wonderful thing to look atWatch from 3:45
Crisp interplay of polished and brushed titanium2 of 8
- aBlogtoWatch Finds the polished and brushed surfaces crisp, with sharp transitions between them.it’s all incredibly crisp, with sharp transitions betweenRead it in context
- aBlogtoWatch Applauds the brand for finishing titanium dynamically rather than leaving it all blasted or brushed.Christopher Ward has wisely realized that titanium should be treated like any other materialRead it in context
- WatchGecko Finds that contrasting finishes make the monotone watch show many shades of metal.despite being completely monotone appears to be lots of different shades of metalWatch from 2:26
- WatchGecko Notes polished and brushed accents plus two titanium grades keep the metallic watch interesting.the design team has made significant efforts to keep the watch interestingWatch from 2:54
Harder Grade 5 titanium bezel is sensible2 of 8
- Britt Pearce Likes the harder Grade 5 titanium on the scratch-prone bezel as a quality step up.grade five titanium so that's a step up in qualityWatch from 4:50
- WatchChris Finds the use of harder Grade 5 titanium for the scratch-prone bezel logical.they've put in grade five titanium that makes a lot of sense to meWatch from 4:01
Layered skeleton gives architectural depth2 of 8
- Oracle of Time Finds the skeletonised dial has impressive architectural depth.The dial has some serious architectural depthWatch from 3:45
- WatchChris Credits the layered, heavily skeletonised movement with adding depth and a pricier look.you're getting a lot of depth and it gives it a more expensive lookWatch from 3:02
COSC certification adds credibility2 of 8
- Chisholm Hunter Views COSC certification as a strong plus.the movement is actually cost certified that's pretty greatWatch from 7:10
- Britt Pearce Views the in-house COSC movement as a main reason for the price.this is really the first thing that marks why this is priced the way that it isWatch from 3:51
Legible by skeleton-watch standards2 of 8
- aBlogtoWatch Finds legibility well beyond most skeleton watches, though below the regular Twelves.it’s miles beyond mostRead it in context
- Britt Pearce Legible for a skeletonised watch, with lumed hands giving enough contrast.their Loom filed hands that provides just enough contrastWatch from 7:45
Bright lume on the chapter ring2 of 8
- aBlogtoWatch Reports bright lume and a more practical chapter-ring execution.low-light visibility was excellentRead it in context
- WatchChris Appreciates the bright lume ring marking the primary indices around the dial.this very bright line of loom that goes around the dialWatch from 9:47
- WatchChris Likes that the unlumed seconds hand crosses the lume ring, showing the watch runs in the dark.so it's a little trick that looks greatWatch from 10:16
Revised faceted handset is an improvement2 of 8
- aBlogtoWatch Prefers the new handset over the brand's older triangle-baton combination.They work far better than the old handset.Read it in context
- Harrison Elmore Praises the unexpectedly faceted hands that keep the brand's heritage style.I think these hands look incredible and have these facets on themWatch from 3:24
Fits average to larger wrists well2 of 8
- Britt Pearce Fits perfectly on a 7in wrist with no overhang.just right on my husband's 7in wrist exactly how it should wearWatch from 2:28
- WatchChris Finds it looks good and fits well on a 7.5-inch wrist.I think this looks really really good on my wrist it fits really wellWatch from 8:48
Intricate skeleton design executed cohesively2 of 8
- The Time Teller Finds the intricate design cohesive despite nothing being straightforward.nothing is straightforward in the design here and yet it all fits together seamlesslyWatch from 1:54
- WatchChris Feels the skeletonised design avoids looking cheap because it is done very well.if it's not done well and this is done very wellWatch from 2:06
Shows the brand's willingness to experiment2 of 8
- Britt Pearce Found it an unexpected and unique offering for the brand.this is a pretty unique offering in the catalogWatch from 6:21
- Britt Pearce Welcomes the brand's experimentation beyond just being good value.they're not resting on their Laurels they're getting experimentalWatch from 10:41
- WatchChris Admires Christopher Ward's willingness to try different things, exemplified by this release.I've always loved about Christopher Ward is that they just try different thingsWatch from 1:37
Industrial, sporty character on the wrist1 of 8
- Britt Pearce Finds the design industrial and edgy.it feels industrial almost aggressiveWatch from 6:48
- Britt Pearce Loves the sporty, cool vibe it gives on the wrist.I love the vibe of this watch it feels very sporty and coolWatch from 6:48
Remains distinctly Christopher Ward1 of 8
- Harrison Elmore Thinks it balances familiar integrated-sports design with fresh elements.it strikes a perfect Bal balance between a familiar integrated sports watch and a design that's freshWatch from 7:16
- Harrison Elmore Likes that it remains distinctly Christopher Ward.gorgeous looking watch that is still very much Christopher WardWatch from 8:13
Practical specs for everyday use1 of 8
- The Time Teller Finds it very functional thanks to sapphire, titanium and a threaded crown.it's supremely functional with the sapphire crystal with the titaniumWatch from 2:22
- The Time Teller Deems 100m water resistance decent and more than enough.I would say decent water resistance rating it's more than enoughWatch from 2:22

Most criticised

Legibility suffers from skeletonisation5 of 8
- aBlogtoWatch Admits legibility is still not perfect despite the black-coated bridges.It’s not perfect, but it’s quite a bit better.Read it in context
- WatchGecko Considers skeletonised watches, this one included, poor for legibility.skeletonized watches generally destroy legibility and that's something that's really important to meWatch from 0:28
- The Time Teller Small indices make time-reading less bold and quick.smaller indexes on this dial means it's not the boldest or quickest display of timeWatch from 2:52
- Britt Pearce Less legible than the original Twelve, inherent to skeletonisation.is it as legible as the original 12 noWatch from 7:45
- Harrison Elmore Wishes the chapter ring were brighter or indices longer, as legibility suffers occasionally.it does make it difficult to read or the indices could have been a little longerWatch from 9:10
Noticeably thicker than the standard Twelve3 of 8
- Chisholm Hunter Prefers the smaller, thinner sizing of the original Twelve.I do prefer the sizing of the original 12Watch from 1:27
- Britt Pearce Considers the 3mm extra thickness over the titanium Twelve significant.3 mm is a big deal in the world of watchesWatch from 1:27
- Oracle of Time Calls the extra 2mm of thickness over the standard Twelve the only real issue.which is pretty much my only issue with this watchWatch from 2:21
- Oracle of Time Feels the sharp, faceted case shape becomes unwieldy at this thickness.here it just feels a little bit unwieldyWatch from 2:21
Rivals offer comparable quality for similar money2 of 8
- Chisholm Hunter Notes that at around four grand, Tudor offers METAS certification.grand Mark you're looking at a chudar and a chudar is meta certifiedWatch from 7:39
- Harrison Elmore Doesn't consider it the best value, noting Oris offers similar finishing at similar price.I'm just not saying that it is the best value in the worldWatch from 4:50
Sizing may be too large for some wrists2 of 8
- Britt Pearce Too large with lug overhang on a 5.5in wrist, even on the rubber strap.I think I'm sized out of this oneWatch from 2:28
- Harrison Elmore Nitpicks that it could be about a millimetre smaller.I wish it was maybe a millimeter smallerWatch from 9:10
Steep price rise over the previous Twelve1 of 8
- Chisholm Hunter Finds the £4,120 price staggering.this model comes in at a staggering £ 4,120 with the braceletWatch from 2:24
- Chisholm Hunter Considers the roughly £3,000 jump over the previous titanium Twelve too large.they've added pretty much three grand to thatWatch from 2:53
- Chisholm Hunter Understands some increase but still finds it too dramatic.I kind of understand the price increase but this seems quite dramatic to meWatch from 8:08

Open a point to see who said it and jump to that moment in their review.

By aspect

PositiveMixedNegative

How reviewers judged each aspect; one square per reviewer who discussed it
Dial		Mostly liked
Value		Praised
Movement		Praised
Finishing & build		Praised
Design		Praised
Case & proportions		Mixed
Bracelet & strap		Praised
Wearability		Praised
Originality		Praised
Functionality		Few mentions
Versatility		Few mentions

Was this consensus useful?

The reviews

8 counted

Remontoir summarises; the reviewers did the work. Watch and read the originals for the full picture.

Harrison Elmore

From Affordable to Luxury: Christopher Ward Twelve X (Ti) Review

Video, 11 minHands-on reviewDec 2024

Very positiveRecommends

Sees the titanium Twelve X as a genuine integrated-sports-watch contender that elevates Christopher Ward, praising its finishing, openworked dial, bracelet and lightness. The price is called fair but not class-leading value, and the only complaints are nitpicks about legibility, micro-adjustment and size.

Suits: Christopher Ward fans and mechanics enthusiasts who like skeletonised integrated sports watches

Disclosure: Brand loaner

What they said, point by point

Designpositive: Calls the titanium Twelve X a striking design. 1:26
Feels the faceted bezel is bold yet not overdone. 1:56
Considers the watch aesthetically gorgeous. 5:47
Dialmixed: Praises the unexpectedly faceted hands that keep the brand's heritage style. 3:24
Though not usually a skeleton fan, thinks this openworked dial is really well done. 5:47
Enjoys seeing the keyless works and motion works operate through the dial. 6:16
Wishes the chapter ring were brighter or indices longer, as legibility suffers occasionally. 9:10
Case & proportionspositive: Notes the case is relatively thin. 5:18
Nitpicks that it could be about a millimetre smaller. 9:10
Wearabilitypositive: Says it is so light and comfortable it could be worn daily without noticing it. 5:18
Considers the comfort especially impressive for a relatively large watch. 5:18
Bracelet & strappositive: Considers the integrated bracelet and its finishing the standout feature. 1:56
Finds the bracelet facets beautiful and the fit comfortable. 7:45
Appreciates built-in quick-release bars making strap changes easy on an integrated design. 8:13
Wishes the butterfly clasp offered on-the-fly micro-adjustment, though lightness reduces the need. 7:45
Finishing & buildpositive: Singles out the finishing and overall look as what they love most. 3:24
Finds details like bridge treatments, crown guards and crown elegant and luxurious. 4:21
Doesn't think it feels like a $20,000 watch when compared with AP. 4:21
Originalitypositive: Thinks it balances familiar integrated-sports design with fresh elements. 7:16
Acknowledges it is a little derivative of other brands' designs. 7:16
Likes that it remains distinctly Christopher Ward. 8:13
Sees it as following Oris's openworked-then-standard ProPilot X playbook. 2:54
Valuemixed: Believes it competes well with other designs at around $5,000. 4:21
Considers the price fair for what you get. 4:50
Doesn't consider it the best value, noting Oris offers similar finishing at similar price. 4:50
Compared with: Audemars Piguet Royal Oak (openworked): Doesn't feel like AP, but AP costs several tens of thousands more.
Oris ProPilot X: Similar openworked titanium concept and finishing at around the same price.

Watch on YouTube

Britt Pearce

The Most Expensive Christopher Ward: The Twelve X WORTH IT?

Video, 13 minHands-on reviewJun 2024

Very positiveRecommends, with caveats

Enthusiastic about the Twelve X as a genuine step up for Christopher Ward, praising its finishing, movement, cool skeletonised design and new micro-adjust clasp. Finds it expensive but appropriately priced; notes it wears large and is thicker than the original Twelve.

Suits: Wrists 6.5in or larger; buyers wanting a more premium step up from the Twelve

Disclosure: Brand loaner

What they said, point by point

Wearabilitymixed: Integrated bracelet makes it wear larger than its diameter implies. 2:01
Too large with lug overhang on a 5.5in wrist, even on the rubber strap. 2:28
Fits perfectly on a 7in wrist with no overhang. 2:28
Titanium lightness is noticeable, though not the lightest titanium watch. 1:27
Case & proportionsmixed: Considers the 3mm extra thickness over the titanium Twelve significant. 1:27
Wishes for a 36mm version, acknowledging it would need a new movement. 2:57
Movementpositive: Views the in-house COSC movement as a main reason for the price. 3:51
Finds the exposed movement nicely finished. 4:21
Finishing & buildpositive: Calls the finishing unusually good for the price. 4:21
Accepts machine finishing when executed to this standard. 4:21
Likes the harder Grade 5 titanium on the scratch-prone bezel as a quality step up. 4:50
Appreciates the brand's transparency about machine rather than hand finishing. 5:20
Designpositive: Finds the design industrial and edgy. 6:48
Changed the reviewer's view on openworked watches. 6:48
Loves the sporty, cool vibe it gives on the wrist. 6:48
Dialmixed: Legible for a skeletonised watch, with lumed hands giving enough contrast. 7:45
Less legible than the original Twelve, inherent to skeletonisation. 7:45
Bracelet & strappositive: Calls the added clasp micro-adjustment a huge upgrade. 8:44
Originalitypositive: Found it an unexpected and unique offering for the brand. 6:21
Welcomes the brand's experimentation beyond just being good value. 10:41
Valuepositive: Acknowledges the price is punchy for a brand known for ~£1,000 watches. 9:13
Considers it still good value given the across-the-board upgrades. 9:42
Believes the watch is appropriately priced, though not for everyone. 10:12
Compared with: Christopher Ward The Twelve Titanium 40mm: Twelve X is thicker, less legible and pricier, but more premium throughout.
Patek Philippe Nautilus 5711: 5711 lacks butterfly clasp micro-adjustment, which the Twelve X now has.
Vacheron Constantin Overseas: Twelve X's micro-adjust clasp works similarly to the Overseas'.

Watch on YouTube

aBlogtoWatch

Hands-On Debut: The Titanium Skeleton Christopher Ward The Twelve X Watch

ArticleHands-on reviewApr 2024Mike Razak

Very positiveRecommends

An enthusiastic hands-on that finds the titanium Twelve X exceptionally finished, surprisingly light and more legible than most skeletons. It argues the watch challenges far pricier rivals, with minor reservations about its chunkier size and the movement finishing.

What the review says, point by point

Finishing & buildpositive: Finds the polished and brushed surfaces crisp, with sharp transitions between them.
Notes the titanium looks like steel thanks to its finishing and tone.
Applauds the brand for finishing titanium dynamically rather than leaving it all blasted or brushed.
Case & proportionsmixed: Finds the larger dimensions noticeable for anyone used to the regular Twelves.
Credits the rounded case and smooth case-to-bracelet transition for softening the bulk.
Wearabilitypositive: Was surprised by how light the watch is given its steel-like look.
Says it still wears well but feels chunkier.
Bracelet & strappositive: Appreciates the case chamfer continuing onto the bracelet links.
Finds the 3mm clasp micro-adjustment sufficient for a perfect fit.
Disputes the brand's claim that the micro-adjust is unprecedented for integrated bracelets.
Dialpositive: Finds legibility well beyond most skeleton watches, though below the regular Twelves.
Admits legibility is still not perfect despite the black-coated bridges.
Prefers the new handset over the brand's older triangle-baton combination.
Reports bright lume and a more practical chapter-ring execution.
Movementpositive: Finds the skeletonised bridges intentional and engaging in appearance.
Movement finishing is as expected for the brand but not on par with higher-end watches.
Considers the COSC certification and five-day power reserve impressive specs.
Valuepositive: Highlights a truly in-house movement at under $5k.
Doubts that similar watches from luxury brands justify their much higher prices.
Compared with: Christopher Ward The Twelve (titanium): The X is wider, thicker and chunkier, and less legible than regular Twelves.
Bell & Ross BR 05: Would wear like the BR 05 if not for its rounded case.
Christopher Ward C60 Concept: Shares dial design, but the Twelve X's lume execution is more practical.
Vacheron Constantin Overseas: Overseas bracelet had a similar micro-adjust nearly a decade earlier.
Formex Essence: Formex has long offered a similar bracelet micro-adjust mechanism.

Read on ablogtowatch.com

WatchGecko

A Very Special Skeletonised Watch - Christopher Ward Twelve X

Video, 6 minHands-on reviewApr 2024

PositiveRecommends, with caveats

A self-declared skeleton sceptic finds the Twelve X technically superb, with a beautiful SH21 movement, faultless detailing and a fair price. It doesn't convert the reviewer personally because skeletonisation hurts legibility, but for skeleton fans it's called unbeatable for the money.

Suits: Fans of skeletonised watches wanting high-end technical detail at an accessible price

What they said, point by point

Designmixed: Finds that contrasting finishes make the monotone watch show many shades of metal. 2:26
Notes polished and brushed accents plus two titanium grades keep the metallic watch interesting. 2:54
Says the watch does not change a personal dislike of skeletonised designs. 3:51
Ultimately calls it a stunning watch. 5:20
Dialnegative: Considers skeletonised watches, this one included, poor for legibility. 0:28
Movementpositive: Concedes the SH21 movement is a work of art despite a skeptical stance. 1:59
Impressed by the twin barrels and long power reserve. 1:59
Says it stands out from affordable skeletons that use fairly standard movements. 1:30
Finishing & buildpositive: States the attention to detail cannot be faulted. 2:26
Likens the watchmaking level to high-end brands like Richard Mille or Hublot at a fraction of the price. 2:54
Handling it evokes a sense of awe at the inner workings. 4:21
Valuepositive: Acknowledges it is a lot of money but judges the price fair given the specs and effort. 3:23
Says skeleton fans will find nothing better for the money. 5:20

Watch on YouTube

Chisholm Hunter

NEW Christopher Ward Twelve X - The Good, Bad, And Ugly!

Video, 9 minHands-on reviewApr 2024

PositiveRecommends, with caveats

Calls the Twelve X a brilliant watch, praising its slim case for a 120-hour movement, the skeletonised dial and the COSC-certified movement. However, the reviewer is hesitant about the £4,120 price, a dramatic jump for a brand seen as entry-level luxury.

What they said, point by point

Case & proportionsmixed: Finds 12.3mm thickness impressive given the 120-hour power reserve movement. 0:29
Prefers the smaller, thinner sizing of the original Twelve. 1:27
Wearabilitypositive: Found it comfortable and pleasant on the wrist with the bracelet. 1:27
Dialpositive: Loves seeing the movement's beating heart through the skeletonised dial. 4:48
Acknowledges skeleton dials can be less practical and harder to read. 4:48
Movementpositive: Considers the in-house movement beautiful to look at, with visible twin barrels. 6:42
Views COSC certification as a strong plus. 7:10
Notes that at around four grand, Tudor offers METAS certification. 7:39
Valuenegative: Finds the £4,120 price staggering. 2:24
Considers the roughly £3,000 jump over the previous titanium Twelve too large. 2:53
Acknowledges the titanium finishing and upgrades add cost. 4:21
Understands some increase but still finds it too dramatic. 8:08
Compared with: Christopher Ward The Twelve (original 40mm): Prefers the original's smaller, thinner sizing; far cheaper too.

Watch on YouTube

The Time Teller

Hands-On w/ Christopher Ward's Newest Creation: The Twelve X Ti

Video, 5 minHands-on reviewApr 2024

Very positiveRecommends

Despite usually disliking angular bezels, integrated bracelets and skeleton dials, the reviewer was won over by the Twelve X. The reviewer praises its movement, detailing, comfort and everyday practicality, with only small legibility and clasp quibbles, and sees strong value for its price.

Suits: Skeptics of integrated-bracelet and skeleton watches; wearers wanting an everyday titanium piece

What they said, point by point

Designpositive: Finds the intricate design cohesive despite nothing being straightforward. 1:54
Handling it overturned the reviewer's usual dislike of angular bezels and integrated bracelets. 0:00
Believes photos fail to convey how the watch looks in person. 1:54
Movementpositive: Calls the movement outstanding, citing its long power reserve and smooth sweep. 1:54
Enjoys watching the movement and double barrels through the skeletonised dial. 2:22
Dialmixed: Appreciates that the skeletonised dial lets the movement be seen in motion. 2:22
Small indices make time-reading less bold and quick. 2:52
Bracelet & strapmixed: Finds the bracelet very comfortable and it doesn't pull arm hair. 2:22
Dislikes butterfly clasps in general, though accepts it works on this watch. 3:21
Finishing & buildpositive: Considers the attention to detail undeniable. 2:22
Ranks the brand highly for build quality and detailing. 4:18
Functionalitypositive: Finds it very functional thanks to sapphire, titanium and a threaded crown. 2:22
Deems 100m water resistance decent and more than enough. 2:22
Versatilitypositive: Believes it can be worn daily for swimming, gym and general activity. 2:22
Valuepositive: Argues a bigger brand would charge around $20,000 for a similar watch. 4:18
Notes it is not an entry-level purchase, yet impressive under five thousand. 4:18

Watch on YouTube

WatchChris

Christopher Ward Just put Expensive Luxury Watch Brands on NOTICE. The CW Twelve X - In-House SH21

Video, 12 minHands-on reviewApr 2024

Very positiveRecommends

Very impressed by the Twelve X, praising its well-executed skeletonised movement, surprisingly thin titanium case, excellent micro-adjust bracelet and detailed lume. Considers it a watch that looks far more expensive than its sub-$5,000 price, and advises buying it on the bracelet.

What they said, point by point

Designpositive: Feels the skeletonised design avoids looking cheap because it is done very well. 2:06
Credits the layered, heavily skeletonised movement with adding depth and a pricier look. 3:02
Finds the watch looks and feels more expensive than it is. 2:06
Dialpositive: Appreciates the bright lume ring marking the primary indices around the dial. 9:47
Likes that the unlumed seconds hand crosses the lume ring, showing the watch runs in the dark. 10:16
Case & proportionspositive: Had feared a thick case but feels the brand succeeded in keeping it slim with 100m WR. 9:18
Finds the use of harder Grade 5 titanium for the scratch-prone bezel logical. 4:01
Likes the boxed sapphire caseback, calling it very cool. 4:30
Says the crown guards make it wear slightly larger, like a 42mm. 4:59
Wearabilitypositive: Finds it looks good and fits well on a 7.5-inch wrist. 8:48
Notes it doesn't look thick on the wrist. 9:18
Bracelet & strappositive: Calls the titanium bracelet excellent and beautifully brushed. 5:57
Finds the butterfly clasp micro-adjust easy to use and pleasant in feel, akin to high-end brands. 6:52
Judges the micro-adjust more elegant than rival implementations on butterfly clasps. 10:43
Recommends choosing the bracelet version over the strap because the bracelet is so good. 8:19
Movementpositive: Finds the movement very nicely finished. 7:51
Feels the large movement looks as good through the caseback as from the front. 4:30
Finishing & buildpositive: Believes every detail of the watch has been carefully considered. 9:47
Valuepositive: Thinks it could pass for a $10,000–20,000 watch. 7:22
Cites the engineering, materials and micro-adjust as impressive for under $5,000. 8:19
Acknowledges the price may seem high to some buyers. 7:51
Originalitypositive: Admires Christopher Ward's willingness to try different things, exemplified by this release. 1:37
Notes the watch remains recognisable through its case and bracelet despite no dial branding. 7:51

Watch on YouTube

Oracle of Time

Christopher Ward Twelve X | Review

Video, 4 minHands-on reviewApr 2024

PositiveRecommends, with caveats

After a week of wear, the reviewer warmed to the Twelve X, calling it a spectacular showcase for the SH21 movement and strong value against pricier rivals. The extra thickness is the main complaint, and the reviewer still prefers the classic Twelve's design.

What they said, point by point

Movementpositive: Says the movement looks spectacular through both the caseback and the open dial. 1:54
Finds winding the movement fun. 3:45
Believes the SH21 calibre has never received the credit it deserves. 0:56
Finishing & buildpositive: Considers the finishing central and says the movement has never looked better. 1:25
Expresses mild doubt about the brand's claim that CNC machining rivals hand finishing. 1:54
Sees the watch as proof that the brand can compete with skeletonised luxury sports models from bigger names. 3:16
Case & proportionsnegative: Calls the extra 2mm of thickness over the standard Twelve the only real issue. 2:21
Feels the sharp, faceted case shape becomes unwieldy at this thickness. 2:21
Sees the thickness as a necessary compromise for the movement's size. 2:21
Bracelet & strapmixed: Finds the new micro-adjustment clasp disconcerting at first, needing force to operate. 2:49
Values the extra 3mm of adjustment for a better fit. 2:49
Designmixed: Was initially unmoved by the watch, noting a general disinterest in skeleton watches. 0:00
Personally prefers the design of the standard Twelve. 3:16
Calls it a spec-heavy watch that is wonderful to look at. 3:45
Dialpositive: Finds the skeletonised dial has impressive architectural depth. 3:45
Valuepositive: Points out that its nearest competitor, the Oris ProPilot X, costs over £2,000 more. 3:16
Compared with: Oris ProPilot X: Closest direct competitor, but over £2,000 more expensive.
Christopher Ward The Twelve (40mm): Prefers the standard Twelve's design; the X is over 2mm thicker.

Watch on YouTube

Specifications

Reference: C12-41A5D0-T00K0-B0
Case: 41mm, Grade 2 titanium (Grade 5 titanium bezel and caseback)
Thickness: 12.3mm
Lug to lug: 46.3mm
Movement: Christopher Ward Calibre SH21 CA (skeletonised, COSC) (automatic)
Power reserve: 120 hours
Water resistance: 100m
Crystal: box sapphire with anti-reflective coating, sapphire display caseback
Bracelet or strap: integrated Grade 2 titanium bracelet (25mm tapering to 17mm), butterfly clasp with 3mm micro-adjustment, quick-release
Announced: April 2024
List price (US): $4,865US launch price $4,865 on titanium bracelet, $4,495 on rubber strap (-RK) (aBlogtoWatch hands-on, 25 April 2024).

Creator Consensus is built only from what reviewers said. Prices, retailers and any commercial relationship never affect it. How consensus works