Remontoir
Monta Triumph
Degenerate Watch Addict: Very positiveWorn & Wound: Very positiveaBlogtoWatch: Very positiveHarrison Elmore: Very positiveRandom Rob: Very positiveTwo Broke Watch Snobs: PositiveAverage Bros: PositiveRelative Time: Positive

Each marker on the ring is one counted review, coloured by its verdict.

Monta

Triumph

166BK00SP40mmautomatic$1,850 list priceAnnounced October 2025

The second-generation Monta Triumph, an explorer-style steel sports watch with a black 3-6-9 dial and date, grown from 38.5mm to 40mm with added crown guards. It uses the Sellita SW300-based M-22 automatic and is rated to 200m.

Monta product page

Creator Consensus

Creator Consensus

Very positive

8 reviews: 8 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative. 8 of 8 recommend it.

Every reviewer recommends the Triumph and rates its wearability, bracelet, finishing and value positively, with all praising the smooth clasp and its tool-free micro-adjust. Most highlight a slim case that slips under a cuff, generous bright lume, a short lug-to-lug, and fit and finish that rivals far costlier watches.

Where they differ. Originality divides opinion. Several credit it with building on the Explorer concept rather than copying it, while a couple feel it sits very close to the Rolex. Several also welcome the more streamlined design, though several others feel the refinement costs some of Monta's original character.

Most praised

  • Smooth clasp with easy tool-free micro-adjust8 of 8
    • Worn & Wound Finds the new clasp a big improvement with smooth, crisp action.The newer clasp design is a huge upgrade compared to my V1.Read it in context
    • aBlogtoWatch The clasp is well designed and compact while integrating tool-free extension.completed by a well-conceived folding clasp, which features a rather compact formRead it in context
    • Two Broke Watch Snobs Values the quick-adjust clasp for on-the-fly sizing during activity.two additional positions that I could adjust on the flyRead it in context
    • Harrison Elmore Praises the smooth adjustment action versus cheaper watches.This is nice and smooth. The action on here is fantastic.Watch from 3:49
    • Harrison Elmore Finds the adjustment positions clearer than on a Submariner.This I know exactly if I move forward one or two places.Watch from 4:18
    • Relative Time Likes the slightly sleeker redesigned clasp.now it's a little bit more sleek and defined than the originalWatch from 7:42
    • Random Rob Finds the clasp secure and the tool-free micro-adjust easy to use.toolless on the-fly micro adjust. So, that's easy to use.Watch from 2:55
    • Average Bros Finds the toolless micro-adjust clasp premium in feel and construction.It feels premium. It looks premium.Watch from 12:04
    • Degenerate Watch Addict Finds the clasp smooth and easy, judging it superior to the Explorer's system after longer ownership.The Triumph's clasp is buttery smooth, user-friendly,Watch from 5:43
    • Degenerate Watch Addict Clasp finishing leaves no anxiety about marking or quality.finished in such a way that I don't experience autistic anxietyWatch from 5:43
  • Slim case slips easily under a cuff6 of 8
    • Worn & Wound Notes the thickness lets it slip under a cuff while still feeling substantial.it slides easily under a cuff (if that’s your jam)Read it in context
    • aBlogtoWatch The flat caseback profile adds to the slim silhouette.the profile of the caseback remains quite flatRead it in context
    • Harrison Elmore Finds the thickness slim enough to slip under a shirt cuff.really easy to slip under the cuffWatch from 4:18
    • Random Rob Appreciates the slim thickness.The thickness, it's only 10.6 mm.Watch from 1:55
    • Average Bros Impressed by how thin the case looks on the wrist.But look at how thin that is. My goodness.Watch from 13:58
    • Degenerate Watch Addict Calls the thin case height the standout feature.The 10 mm case height is the star of the show.Watch from 2:26
    • aBlogtoWatch The larger diameter makes it feel flatter and thinner on the wrist than the predecessor.the Triumph V2 feels flatter and thinner on the wristRead it in context
    • aBlogtoWatch Feels notably thin for a watch with 200m water resistance.the Triumph V2 feeling notably thin for a watch with 200 meters of water resistanceRead it in context
    • Harrison Elmore Finds it extremely slim and very comfortable.It's incredibly comfortable to wear.Watch from 7:11
    • Harrison Elmore Finds it works under a dress shirt cuff.if you want to wear this with a dress shirtWatch from 4:18
  • Generous, bright lume application6 of 8
    • aBlogtoWatch Larger markers hold more lume, which improves lume performance.ultimately translates to increased lume performance on the Triumph V2Read it in context
    • Two Broke Watch Snobs Lume glowed strongly all night, rivaling a Seiko dive watch.the glow was excellent throughout the nightRead it in context
    • Relative Time Rates the lume as good, with a healthy application.loom is good. It's got a nice, healthy application of blue BGW9Watch from 6:44
    • Random Rob Finds the lume heavily and evenly applied.Heavy application, very uniform, no weird spotsWatch from 8:37
    • Degenerate Watch Addict Lume works as expected.It glows and functions as it should.Watch from 14:14
    • Average Bros Considers the all-applied lume brighter, bolder and more legible than before.brighter, bolder, and flat out better, more legibleWatch from 17:46
    • aBlogtoWatch Luminous numerals give the dial the same layout in daylight and in the dark.allows the updated dial to have the same fundamental display, both in the daylight and in the darkRead it in context
  • Short lug-to-lug despite the upsizing5 of 8
    • Worn & Wound Finds the move to 40mm subtle but beneficial, and the 47mm lug-to-lug ideal for most wrists.The size bump is subtle but noticeable in the best way.Read it in context
    • Two Broke Watch Snobs Appreciates that lug-to-lug was kept short despite the upsizing.Monta has wisely kept the lug-to-lug distance in checkRead it in context
    • Relative Time Appreciates that lug-to-lug stayed around 47.5mm despite the wider case.they've kept the same at about 47 and a halfWatch from 1:26
    • Random Rob Calls the 47mm lug-to-lug perfect, putting the watch in Goldilocks sizing.The 47 lug to lug is perfect.Watch from 1:55
    • Harrison Elmore Says the lug-to-lug gives a good fit on the wrist.It does have a good lug to lug. So, it fits really wellWatch from 0:56
  • Solid build quality and attention to detail5 of 8
    • aBlogtoWatch Has never met anyone disappointed by Monta's build quality or ergonomics.was in any way let down by its build-quality or ergonomicsRead it in context
    • Two Broke Watch Snobs Finds the steel case very well built.The 316L stainless steel case feels very well made.Read it in context
    • Two Broke Watch Snobs Lists Monta's quality and attention to detail as a pro.Typical Monta quality and attention to detailRead it in context
    • Random Rob Describes the build as very high quality.They are very high quality.Watch from 1:55
    • Random Rob Says the watch's strength lies in its fine details.where these shine obviously is all the fine little detailsWatch from 3:52
    • Average Bros Says quality, fit, finish and tolerances are what stand out most.the thing that shouts at you is the quality, the fit, the finish, the tight toleranceWatch from 18:42
    • Harrison Elmore Considers the finishing well within its price range.nice finishing that I think is very much within its price rangeWatch from 7:11
  • Fit and finish rival far costlier watches5 of 8
    • Relative Time Describes the fit and finish as near-luxury level.Basically, a luxurylike fit and finish.Watch from 2:52
    • Relative Time Believes it stands up to watches costing about twice as much.this watch can stand up to others that are about twice its priceWatch from 2:52
    • Average Bros Judges it noticeably finer than a more expensive mainstream-brand watch.this is even I think quite noticeably finer than a Line watchWatch from 23:21
    • Harrison Elmore Feels it has big-brand quality despite being a microbrand.it's got big brand quality behind itWatch from 7:40
    • Random Rob Would guess a $4,000–6,000 price from handling it.I would place this in the 4 to 6,000Watch from 7:12
    • Average Bros Says it undercuts Tudor pricing while matching their execution.Montas still able to undercut their pricing while rivalingWatch from 23:49
    • Worn & Wound Feels the bracelet finishing exceeds what the price suggests.finished to a level that feels well above its price tagRead it in context
Show 24 more
  • Delivers more than its price suggests5 of 8
    • Worn & Wound Finds the value proposition hard to argue with.It’s hard to argue with the value propositionRead it in context
    • aBlogtoWatch Considers it a very compelling option for its intended buyer.the Triumph V2 is a very compelling optionRead it in context
    • Harrison Elmore Believes the brand delivers as much as possible for its price.they do everything they possibly can for the price that they sell it forWatch from 7:40
    • Random Rob Believes it outperforms its price point.It punches higher than the price point would indicate.Watch from 7:41
    • Degenerate Watch Addict Considers it better value than Swiss brands charging far more for similar movements.Monta is the better dealWatch from 15:44
  • Well-articulated links drape comfortably4 of 8
    • aBlogtoWatch Fully articulating links make the bracelet more flexible than typical three-link bracelets.enables the bracelet to be noticeably more flexible than the standard three-linkRead it in context
    • Average Bros Praises the bracelet's articulation, tolerances and drape.Everything is beautifully articulated, fully articulated, smooth, tight tolerances, wonderful drape thereWatch from 10:41
    • Degenerate Watch Addict Links articulate well.The links articulate well.Watch from 4:20
    • Two Broke Watch Snobs Bracelet is quiet and never pulled hair over weeks of wear.No nonsense, no rattling or squeakingRead it in context
  • Fits a wide range of wrist sizes well4 of 8
    • Two Broke Watch Snobs Suits small wrists such as the reviewer's 6.5 inches.very wearable for those with a small wristRead it in context
    • Relative Time Finds the fit practically ideal on a 7.25-inch wrist.which on my seven and a quarter inch wrist is practically idealWatch from 1:26
    • Random Rob Strongly prefers this size on a 7.25-inch wrist.on my seven and a quarter inch wrist, I much prefer this size,Watch from 6:15
    • Average Bros Finds it wears nicely on a 7.5-inch, tall rounded wrist.on my 7 and 1/2 in wrist, this wears quite nicelyWatch from 12:59
    • Random Rob Describes the on-wrist fit as perfect.on wrist, it's just perfectWatch from 6:44
  • SW300-based movement is top-tier and reliable4 of 8
    • aBlogtoWatch Considers the SW300 base one of the best third-party Swiss time-and-date movements.universally regarded as one of the top choices for third-party Swiss time-and-date movementsRead it in context
    • Random Rob Regards the regulated SW300 base as a top-tier movement.it's a regulated Celita SW300 which is already a more top grade movementWatch from 3:24
    • Worn & Wound Regards the M-22 base as a proven, reliable movement.a workhorse movement that’s proven reliable across Monta’s lineupRead it in context
    • Harrison Elmore Calls the movement well made and built.Very wellmade, very well-b built.Watch from 5:18
  • Water resistance upgrade adds robustness4 of 8
    • Two Broke Watch Snobs Considers 200m water resistance well into dive watch territory.which is well into dive watch territoryRead it in context
    • Two Broke Watch Snobs Credits it with high legibility, robustness and superior water resistance.High legibility, robust construction and superior water resistanceRead it in context
    • Harrison Elmore Sees 200m as somewhat unnecessary for a field watch but nice to have.semi unnecessary, but fantastic to have on thereWatch from 6:15
    • Random Rob Welcomes the upgrade from 150m to 200m, while noting few people need it.200 m water resistance which is another improvement over the previousWatch from 3:24
    • Average Bros Considers the 200m water resistance a welcome, robust spec.200 m of water resistance, which is nice and uh robustWatch from 10:13
  • Crown guards add sporty presence and protection3 of 8
    • Worn & Wound Highlights the new crown guards as adding presence and shifting it toward an all-rounder sports watch.It’s a nice detail that gives the watch more presenceRead it in context
    • aBlogtoWatch Crown guards give the watch a more modern and sporty silhouette.providing the Triumph V2 with a more modern and sporty silhouetteRead it in context
    • aBlogtoWatch Crown guards add protection for the crown.crown guards have been added, which offer increased protection for the winding crownRead it in context
    • Degenerate Watch Addict Likes the crown guards as an improvement on the Explorer concept.Off the rip, I'm a fan of the crown guards.Watch from 1:58
  • Bold, uncluttered dial is highly legible3 of 8
    • Worn & Wound Finds the bold printing, glossy markers and minimal text make it very easy to read.resulting in a dial that’s easy to read at a glanceRead it in context
    • aBlogtoWatch Enlarged markings improve legibility.the markings themselves have been made larger to further promote legibilityRead it in context
    • Harrison Elmore Finds the 3 and 9 numerals large and very legible.the three and the nine are large, legible, and fantasticWatch from 1:54
    • Worn & Wound Says the applied 9 and 3 numerals benefit from the larger dial.those bold applied “9” and “3” numerals really benefit from the extra real estateRead it in context
    • Harrison Elmore Considers the legibility-focused, elegant design its strongest suit.designed around legibility, usability, and a little bit of eleganceWatch from 0:56
  • More refined, streamlined design than before3 of 8
    • Two Broke Watch Snobs Finds the dial much more open and elegant with fewer numerals and smaller text.The dial feels far more open thanks to the removal of most numeralsRead it in context
    • Average Bros Finds the updated design less cluttered, more streamlined and refined.It is less cluttered. It is more streamlined, more refined.Watch from 5:02
    • Two Broke Watch Snobs Finds the new design more refined and elegant.contributes to a more elegant lookRead it in context
    • Harrison Elmore Feels the design has matured into a solid mainstay of the lineup.I think this design has matured, though.Watch from 0:27
  • Builds on the Explorer concept rather than copying3 of 8
    • Worn & Wound Sees the Explorer comparison as part of its appeal given few rivals in the segment.There simply aren’t many modern Explorer-style watches in this mid-luxury rangeRead it in context
    • Degenerate Watch Addict Sees it as extending the Explorer concept rather than copying it.extrapolates the Explorer concept rather than blatantly ripping it offWatch from 1:58
    • Harrison Elmore Considers giving buyers what they want a legitimate approach.I think that there's nothing wrong with that.Watch from 6:43
  • Crisp brushing with restrained polished accents3 of 8
    • Worn & Wound Likes the crisp brushing and the polished bezel adding restrained flash.the polished bezel adds just enough flash to catch the lightRead it in context
    • Relative Time Highlights crisp transitions and beautiful polishing.transitions are sharply defined, and the polish is beautifulWatch from 3:22
    • Degenerate Watch Addict Despite preferring brushed watches, likes the Triumph's polish as not obnoxious.It's not like an obnoxious mirror polish. It just looks really good.Watch from 6:41
    • Degenerate Watch Addict Polished exterior reads as a subtle highlight due to the slim bezel.the polished exterior is just a subtle highlightWatch from 7:40
  • Bracelet ranks among the best in class3 of 8
    • Worn & Wound Considers the bracelet a highlight, comfortable and precise.The bracelet, as always with Monta, is a standout.Read it in context
    • aBlogtoWatch Rates the bracelet above those on much pricier watches.a solid step above what you often find on watches that cost significantly moreRead it in context
    • Random Rob Ranks the bracelet among the best in the industry.This is like one of the best bracelets in the business too by the wayWatch from 2:25
  • Very comfortable for all-day wear3 of 8
    • Worn & Wound Found it comfortable over a few days of office wear.found it pretty comfortableRead it in context
    • Two Broke Watch Snobs Calls it exceptionally comfortable thanks to bracelet, size and lug-to-lug.make the Triumph an exceptionally comfortable watchRead it in context
    • Degenerate Watch Addict Finds it not too heavy, with a thin case and comfortable bracelet.She's not too heavy. The case is thin. The bracelet is comfortable.Watch from 4:20
    • Degenerate Watch Addict Still very comfortable after two miles of uphill hiking in the sun.So, as of now, still very comfortable. Can't complain.Watch from 11:04
  • Balanced, substantial presence without bulk3 of 8
    • Worn & Wound Says it feels more balanced and confident on the wrist.On the wrist, it feels more balanced, more legible, and somehow more confident.Read it in context
    • Average Bros Describes the bold wear as purposeful and balanced.Bold wear definitely feels very purposeful and still balanced on the wristWatch from 21:00
    • Two Broke Watch Snobs Has noticeable heft without feeling obtrusive.It has a pleasing heft on the bracelet yet never feels obtrusiveRead it in context
  • Genuinely go-anywhere everyday watch3 of 8
    • Worn & Wound Believes it has become a true go-anywhere, do-anything watch.morphed from field watch to now a truly GADA (go anywhere do anything) watchRead it in context
    • Average Bros Credits its balanced, plain design with making it highly versatile.what makes it so versatile is again the fact that it is a bit vanillaWatch from 20:06
    • Two Broke Watch Snobs Still functions as a legible field watch wearable all day.it still works as a legible field watchRead it in context
    • Worn & Wound Feels it remains robust enough for hard use despite the refinement.it certainly still feels like it was built to be used and abusedRead it in context
  • Competitive introductory and retail pricing3 of 8
    • Two Broke Watch Snobs Considers the regular price still competitive.the price will be $1,850., which remains competitiveRead it in context
    • Two Broke Watch Snobs Lists the introductory price as a pro.Read the review
    • Relative Time Considers the pre-order price great and full retail reasonable.that 1550 is a great price. And even at 1850, it's still pretty reasonableWatch from 8:36
    • Random Rob Welcomes the expected price drop from the previous model.It's going to be less money than the previous Triumph.Watch from 5:47
  • Crown action is smooth and easy2 of 8
    • Harrison Elmore Appreciates the onion-style crown for easier operation.onion style crown, which makes it even easier to operateWatch from 4:48
    • Degenerate Watch Addict Finds the screw-down crown's action ideal, smooth yet solid.The screw-down crown is perfection.Watch from 12:08
  • Clearly differentiated, well-executed hands2 of 8
    • Harrison Elmore Likes the clearly differentiated sword hands with an oversized hour hand.the sword style hand is very obvious, the differentiator between each of the handsWatch from 1:54
    • Harrison Elmore Prefers the arrow-tipped lumed seconds hand for night visibility.You made the second hand more noticeable late at night.Watch from 2:24
    • Random Rob Praises the diamond-cut hands and applied markers.The handset is diamond cut, rodeium plated. Uh, you have really nice applied markersWatch from 3:52
  • Date placement is practical and symmetrical2 of 8
    • Harrison Elmore Considers the date window a functional plus.I think functionalitywise that's fantastic.Watch from 1:25
    • Degenerate Watch Addict Finds the 6 o'clock date symmetrical and useful.I find the date at 6:00 works wellWatch from 14:14
  • Classic look with broad appeal2 of 8
    • Relative Time Calls the design classically beautiful and effective, if unoriginal.It may not be very original, but it is classically beautiful and effectiveWatch from 4:50
    • Random Rob Believes the watch's looks will be universally appreciated.everybody can agree that this watch looks beautifulWatch from 5:47
    • Random Rob Calls the black dial perfect and a safe pick.The black one's just perfect. It's safe, right?Watch from 5:47
  • Finishing a clear step up from earlier Montas2 of 8
    • Worn & Wound Believes the finishing has moved up a level versus prior Montas.finishing is one of Monta’s strong suits, and this version takes it up another notchRead it in context
    • Average Bros Regards the quality upgrade over the first gen as indisputable.you can't argue with the qualityWatch from 16:49
  • Elegant Oyster-style bracelet taper2 of 8
    • Relative Time Praises the bracelet's taper and Oyster-style design.an oyster style bracelet with a great taperWatch from 7:13
    • Random Rob Likes the taper from 20mm down to about 16mm.has a a really nice taper down to um about 16 mmWatch from 2:25
  • Upgrade over SW200 with longer power reserve2 of 8
    • aBlogtoWatch Views the SW300 as a clear step above the SW200, with a longer power reserve.Widely considered to be a solid step above SellitaRead it in context
    • Degenerate Watch Addict Considers the SW300 better than the SW200, enabling the thin case.I consider the SW300 an objectively better movement than the 200Watch from 11:04
    • Degenerate Watch Addict Values the 56-hour power reserve as a small but meaningful upgrade.small differences are big differences, and I'll take those upgradesWatch from 11:38
  • Sellita base is easy to service long-term2 of 8
    • Harrison Elmore Values longevity and ease of servicing of Sellita movements.a watch that will continue operating for a long time and be very easy to serviceWatch from 5:47
    • Random Rob Values that any watchmaker can service it, which future-proofs the watch.you have a serviceable, replaceable, um, easy to live with movementWatch from 7:41
  • Strong Explorer alternative for far less2 of 8
    • Relative Time Calls it one of the best Explorer alternatives for the money.one of the best Explore alternatives out there, and especially at this priceWatch from 13:54
    • Average Bros Views it as an Explorer alternative at a fraction of the cost.Rolex Explorer 1 alternative at just a fraction of the costWatch from 23:49

Most criticised

  • Refinement costs some original Monta character4 of 8
    • Worn & Wound Admits some of the earlier Monta personality may be missing from the dial.I do agree a bit of that old Monta personality might be missingRead it in context
    • Worn & Wound Feels a slight loss of the older Monta DNA.I do feel a slight mourning for that old Monta DNARead it in context
    • Two Broke Watch Snobs Feels the refinement costs some of the original's charm.establishes a more refined presence but also loses some of the charmRead it in context
    • Two Broke Watch Snobs Large numerals and polish pull it away from its Gen1 roots.pulls the Triumph away from its Gen1 rootsRead it in context
    • Relative Time Mourns the loss of the original's creativity.I am kind of mourning the loss of originality and creativity from this new oneWatch from 12:00
    • Average Bros Misses the distinctive character of the first-generation design.of course I do miss the uniquenessWatch from 4:08
  • Dial layout feels slightly unbalanced2 of 8
    • Two Broke Watch Snobs Feels the large applied 3 and 9 numerals dominate the dial.they dominate the dial in a way the original never didRead it in context
    • Two Broke Watch Snobs Wishes for a numeral at 6 to better balance the dial.leaves me wanting a numeral at 6 as wellRead it in context
    • Harrison Elmore Notes a slight visual imbalance between large 12 marker and small date, calling it a nitpick.You do get a little small imbalance about that, but I'm nitpicking.Watch from 1:54
  • Sits very close to the Rolex Explorer2 of 8
    • aBlogtoWatch Acknowledges some buyers may find it too close to the Rolex Explorer.the Triumph V2 may feel a bit too similar to the Rolex ExplorerRead it in context
    • Relative Time Says it is not an outright homage but is clearly Explorer-inspired.Yet, it's still also very explorerlike. The inspiration is clear.Watch from 10:33
  • Still a significant outlay for a field watch2 of 8
    • Harrison Elmore Acknowledges $1,700 is a lot for a field watch.That's a lot for a field watch, no doubt about it.Watch from 6:43
    • Degenerate Watch Addict Acknowledges it is not an affordable watch.This is not an affordable watch by any measure.Watch from 15:14
  • Crown guards make the crown harder to use1 of 8
    • Two Broke Watch Snobs Crown guards make the crown harder to operate.they have the unwanted effect of making the crown more difficult to useRead it in context
  • Surfaces readily show smudges and dust1 of 8
    • Relative Time Notes the black opaline dial readily shows dust and smudges.this dial seems to be one that shows everythingWatch from 6:16
    • Relative Time Warns that the extensive polish means frequent wiping to stay clean.be prepared to wipe it down frequentlyWatch from 6:44

Open a point to see who said it and jump to that moment in their review.

By aspect

PositiveMixedNegative

How reviewers judged each aspect; one square per reviewer who discussed it
DialPraised
Case & proportionsPraised
WearabilityPraised
Bracelet & strapPraised
Finishing & buildPraised
ValuePraised
DesignPraised
OriginalityMixed
MovementPraised
FunctionalityPraised
VersatilityPraised

Was this consensus useful?

The reviews

8 counted

Remontoir summarises; the reviewers did the work. Watch and read the originals for the full picture.

Degenerate Watch Addict

Monta Triumph 2.0 vs. Rolex Explorer

Video, 24 minComparisonMay 2026

Very positiveRecommends

An owner who also has a Rolex Explorer finds the Triumph 2.0 an excellent field watch: thin, comfortable, with a superior clasp, great crown action and restrained polish. The reviewer enjoys it more than the Explorer and calls it the better deal, while urging buyers to judge for themselves.

Suits: Field/GADA watch wearers and tinkerers who value clasp and bracelet usability

Disclosure: Reviewer owns it

What they said, point by point
Case & proportionspositive
  • Likes the crown guards as an improvement on the Explorer concept. 1:58
  • Calls the thin case height the standout feature. 2:26
  • Finds the screw-down crown's action ideal, smooth yet solid. 12:08
  • Considers the slimmer bezel better proportioned than the Explorer's. 7:10
Wearabilitypositive
  • Finds it not too heavy, with a thin case and comfortable bracelet. 4:20
  • Still very comfortable after two miles of uphill hiking in the sun. 11:04
Bracelet & strappositive
  • Links articulate well. 4:20
  • Finds the clasp smooth and easy, judging it superior to the Explorer's system after longer ownership. 5:43
  • Appreciates tolerances that allow easy bracelet removal and swaps. 5:43
Designpositive
  • Despite preferring brushed watches, likes the Triumph's polish as not obnoxious. 6:41
  • Polished exterior reads as a subtle highlight due to the slim bezel. 7:40
Finishing & buildpositive
  • Clasp finishing leaves no anxiety about marking or quality. 5:43
  • Movement finishing is good, if nothing new. 11:38
Movementpositive
  • Considers the SW300 better than the SW200, enabling the thin case. 11:04
  • Values the 56-hour power reserve as a small but meaningful upgrade. 11:38
  • Winding feels smooth, unlike the gritty feel of other Sellita movements. 12:37
Dialpositive
  • Lume works as expected. 14:14
  • Finds the 6 o'clock date symmetrical and useful. 14:14
  • Expects a no-date version would sell very quickly. 14:45
Originalitymixed
  • Sees it as extending the Explorer concept rather than copying it. 1:58
  • Notes the dial draws obvious influence from other field watches. 14:14
Valuepositive
  • Acknowledges it is not an affordable watch. 15:14
  • Considers it better value than Swiss brands charging far more for similar movements. 15:44
  • Recommends buying at pre-sale for better pricing. 14:45
Compared with
  • Rolex Explorer: More enjoyable to wear and own; better clasp and less shiny polish.
  • Tudor Ranger: Similar aesthetic; Triumph a good alternative if applied indices are wanted.

Watch on YouTube

Two Broke Watch Snobs

Still a Top-Tier Microbrand Watch? Testing The New Monta Triumph vs The Original

ArticleComparisonDec 2025Mark Signorelli

PositiveRecommends, with caveats

Sees the new Triumph as an elevated, exceptionally comfortable modern field watch with excellent lume, a superb bracelet and competitive pricing. However, it loses some Gen1 charm, the crown is harder to use, and a numeral at 6 would be preferred.

Suits: Buyers wanting a larger, dressier field watch, including those with small wrists

What the review says, point by point
Dialmixed
  • Finds the dial much more open and elegant with fewer numerals and smaller text.
  • Feels the large applied 3 and 9 numerals dominate the dial.
  • Wishes for a numeral at 6 to better balance the dial.
  • Lume glowed strongly all night, rivaling a Seiko dive watch.
Case & proportionsmixed
  • Appreciates that lug-to-lug was kept short despite the upsizing.
  • Crown guards make the crown harder to operate.
  • Notes fans of the smaller Gen1 size may be less keen on the larger, thicker case.
Bracelet & strappositive
  • Bracelet is quiet and never pulled hair over weeks of wear.
  • Clasp is very secure though it takes extra effort to close.
  • Values the quick-adjust clasp for on-the-fly sizing during activity.
Wearabilitypositive
  • Calls it exceptionally comfortable thanks to bracelet, size and lug-to-lug.
  • Has noticeable heft without feeling obtrusive.
  • Suits small wrists such as the reviewer's 6.5 inches.
Finishing & buildpositive
  • Finds the steel case very well built.
  • Lists Monta's quality and attention to detail as a pro.
Functionalitypositive
  • Considers 200m water resistance well into dive watch territory.
  • Credits it with high legibility, robustness and superior water resistance.
Versatilitypositive
  • Applied markers and polishing push it toward dressier territory.
  • Still functions as a legible field watch wearable all day.
Designmixed
  • Finds the new design more refined and elegant.
  • Feels the refinement costs some of the original's charm.
  • Large numerals and polish pull it away from its Gen1 roots.
Valuepositive
  • Considers the regular price still competitive.
  • Lists the introductory price as a pro.
Compared with
  • Monta Triumph (Gen1): New version more refined and legible but larger and less charming.
  • Seiko SRPL15: Triumph's lume rivals the Seiko's LumiBrite.

Read on twobrokewatchsnobs.com

Average Bros

The Next Generation Monta Triumph: Now the Ultimate Swiss Made Luxury Rolex Explorer Alternative?

Video, 25 minHands-on reviewOct 2025

PositiveRecommends

Calls the second-gen Triumph an objective upgrade in quality, lume, bracelet and execution, and a luxury-level Explorer alternative that undercuts Tudor. The reviewer personally misses the first gen's quirkier uniqueness and smaller-looking dial.

Suits: Buyers wanting a refined Explorer-style everyday watch without luxury-brand pricing

Disclosure: Brand loaner

What they said, point by point
Designmixed
  • Finds the updated design less cluttered, more streamlined and refined. 5:02
  • Misses the distinctive character of the first-generation design. 4:08
  • Admits a personal preference for the older aesthetic despite the upgrade. 16:49
Dialmixed
  • Considers the all-applied lume brighter, bolder and more legible than before. 17:46
  • Would have preferred a smaller-looking dial like the previous rehaut layout gave. 14:27
  • Wishes the framed date window of the old model had been kept. 7:54
Case & proportionspositive
  • Feels the larger case size puts the brand ahead of market trends. 5:32
  • Sees the guardless crown as giving a contemporary, robust style. 6:58
  • Expects the switch to a fully polished bezel to split opinion. 6:00
  • Impressed by how thin the case looks on the wrist. 13:58
Wearabilitypositive
  • Finds it wears nicely on a 7.5-inch, tall rounded wrist. 12:59
  • Describes the bold wear as purposeful and balanced. 21:00
  • Notes the open dial gives more visual punch; the smaller old model suited the reviewer more. 13:58
Bracelet & strappositive
  • Praises the bracelet's articulation, tolerances and drape. 10:41
  • Finds the toolless micro-adjust clasp premium in feel and construction. 12:04
  • Notes the folding section sticks out a bit, mainly noticeable when handling. 12:31
Finishing & buildpositive
  • Says quality, fit, finish and tolerances are what stand out most. 18:42
  • Regards the quality upgrade over the first gen as indisputable. 16:49
  • Judges it noticeably finer than a more expensive mainstream-brand watch. 23:21
Originalitypositive
  • Accepts the Rolex look is deliberate but views it as an honest evolution of the Triumph. 9:18
  • Considers the case and components original rather than off-the-shelf. 19:11
Versatilitypositive
  • Credits its balanced, plain design with making it highly versatile. 20:06
Functionalitypositive
  • Considers the 200m water resistance a welcome, robust spec. 10:13
Valuepositive
  • Views it as an Explorer alternative at a fraction of the cost. 23:49
  • Says it undercuts Tudor pricing while matching their execution. 23:49
Compared with
  • Monta Triumph (first generation): New one is an objective upgrade, but reviewer prefers the old aesthetic.
  • Rolex Explorer I: Similar-feeling alternative at a fraction of the cost.
  • Tudor Ranger 39mm: Undercuts its price while rivaling execution; has applied indices.
  • Tudor Black Bay 39: Cheaper with comparable execution and a more Explorer-like vibe.
  • Hamilton Khaki Field: Positioned as a super-premium upgrade over it.

Watch on YouTube

Worn & Wound

Hands-On: the Monta Triumph V2

ArticleHands-on reviewOct 2025Words By Kat Shoulders

Very positiveRecommends

A longtime Monta owner sees the Triumph V2 as a refined step up: more legible, better finished, with an excellent bracelet and clasp and strong value. The only reservations are a slight loss of the old Monta personality and a closer resemblance to a Rolex.

Suits: Those wanting an Explorer-style go-anywhere watch without Rolex pricing

What the review says, point by point
Case & proportionspositive
  • Finds the move to 40mm subtle but beneficial, and the 47mm lug-to-lug ideal for most wrists.
  • Highlights the new crown guards as adding presence and shifting it toward an all-rounder sports watch.
  • Notes the thickness lets it slip under a cuff while still feeling substantial.
Dialpositive
  • Finds the bold printing, glossy markers and minimal text make it very easy to read.
  • Says the applied 9 and 3 numerals benefit from the larger dial.
  • Admits some of the earlier Monta personality may be missing from the dial.
Finishing & buildpositive
  • Believes the finishing has moved up a level versus prior Montas.
  • Likes the crisp brushing and the polished bezel adding restrained flash.
Bracelet & strappositive
  • Considers the bracelet a highlight, comfortable and precise.
  • Finds the new clasp a big improvement with smooth, crisp action.
Wearabilitypositive
  • Says it feels more balanced and confident on the wrist.
  • Found it comfortable over a few days of office wear.
Movementpositive
  • Regards the M-22 base as a proven, reliable movement.
Versatilitypositive
  • Believes it has become a true go-anywhere, do-anything watch.
  • Feels it remains robust enough for hard use despite the refinement.
Originalitymixed
  • Sees the Explorer comparison as part of its appeal given few rivals in the segment.
  • Feels a slight loss of the older Monta DNA.
  • Notes the new version is more reminiscent of a Rolex.
Valuepositive
  • Finds the value proposition hard to argue with.
  • Feels the bracelet finishing exceeds what the price suggests.
Compared with
  • Rolex Explorer: Offers Explorer-style appeal at far lower cost, a tool watch you needn't baby.
  • Monta Triumph (V1): V2 more legible with a much better clasp, though less old personality.

Read on wornandwound.com

aBlogtoWatch

Hands-On Debut: Monta Triumph V2 Watch

ArticleHands-on reviewOct 2025Ripley Sellers

Very positiveRecommends

Sees the Triumph V2 as a well-executed, Explorer-inspired sports/field watch. Praises its thin wear, improved legibility and lume, and excellent bracelet and clasp. Notes that its closeness to the Explorer may put some buyers off and that the price is not budget-level.

Suits: Those wanting an elevated field watch with Explorer vibes and well-executed details

What the review says, point by point
Designpositive
  • Crown guards give the watch a more modern and sporty silhouette.
Originalitymixed
  • Crown guards, sword hands and the 6 o'clock date keep it from reading as a direct homage.
  • Acknowledges some buyers may find it too close to the Rolex Explorer.
  • Differs clearly from other current Monta models, unlike earlier generations that looked alike.
Dialpositive
  • Enlarged markings improve legibility.
  • Larger markers hold more lume, which improves lume performance.
  • Luminous numerals give the dial the same layout in daylight and in the dark.
Case & proportionspositive
  • The flat caseback profile adds to the slim silhouette.
  • Crown guards add protection for the crown.
Wearabilitypositive
  • The larger diameter makes it feel flatter and thinner on the wrist than the predecessor.
  • Feels notably thin for a watch with 200m water resistance.
Movementpositive
  • Considers the SW300 base one of the best third-party Swiss time-and-date movements.
  • Views the SW300 as a clear step above the SW200, with a longer power reserve.
Bracelet & strappositive
  • Fully articulating links make the bracelet more flexible than typical three-link bracelets.
  • The clasp is well designed and compact while integrating tool-free extension.
  • Notes some may wish for quick-release end links or a button-release clasp.
  • Rates the bracelet above those on much pricier watches.
Finishing & buildpositive
  • Has never met anyone disappointed by Monta's build quality or ergonomics.
Valuepositive
  • Does not consider Monta a budget-friendly brand.
  • Priced slightly higher than the previous generation.
  • Considers it a very compelling option for its intended buyer.
Compared with
  • Rolex Explorer: Follows the Explorer recipe closely but differs through crown guards, sword hands and date.
  • Monta Triumph (first generation, 38.5mm): V2 feels flatter and thinner on the wrist, with better legibility and lume.

Read on ablogtowatch.com

Harrison Elmore

A Great Alternative To A 40mm Explorer: The Monta Triumph V2

Video, 8 minHands-on reviewOct 2025

Very positiveRecommends

Sees the Triumph as a matured, highly legible Explorer-style watch with excellent bracelet adjustment, slim comfortable wear and good finishing for the price. Notes only small nitpicks: a slight dial imbalance from the date and a high price for a field watch.

Suits: Buyers wanting an Explorer-like look without Rolex prices or waitlists

Disclosure: Sponsored

What they said, point by point
Designpositive
  • Feels the design has matured into a solid mainstay of the lineup. 0:27
  • Considers the legibility-focused, elegant design its strongest suit. 0:56
Dialpositive
  • Finds the 3 and 9 numerals large and very legible. 1:54
  • Likes the clearly differentiated sword hands with an oversized hour hand. 1:54
  • Prefers the arrow-tipped lumed seconds hand for night visibility. 2:24
  • Notes a slight visual imbalance between large 12 marker and small date, calling it a nitpick. 1:54
Case & proportionspositive
  • Notes the case is almost all dial, making it look large. 0:56
  • Finds the thickness slim enough to slip under a shirt cuff. 4:18
  • Appreciates the onion-style crown for easier operation. 4:48
  • Values the Rolex-style chamfer on the lugs. 6:15
Wearabilitypositive
  • Says the lug-to-lug gives a good fit on the wrist. 0:56
  • Finds it extremely slim and very comfortable. 7:11
Bracelet & strappositive
  • Finds the polished bracelet edges rounded and not sharp. 3:21
  • Praises the smooth adjustment action versus cheaper watches. 3:49
  • Finds the adjustment positions clearer than on a Submariner. 4:18
Movementpositive
  • Reports the example running within +3 seconds a day. 5:18
  • Calls the movement well made and built. 5:18
  • Values longevity and ease of servicing of Sellita movements. 5:47
Functionalitypositive
  • Considers the date window a functional plus. 1:25
  • Sees 200m as somewhat unnecessary for a field watch but nice to have. 6:15
Finishing & buildpositive
  • Considers the finishing well within its price range. 7:11
  • Feels it has big-brand quality despite being a microbrand. 7:40
Versatilitypositive
  • Finds it works under a dress shirt cuff. 4:18
Originalitypositive
  • Notes the watch essentially delivers a large Explorer with a date. 6:43
  • Considers giving buyers what they want a legitimate approach. 6:43
Valuepositive
  • Acknowledges $1,700 is a lot for a field watch. 6:43
  • Believes the brand delivers as much as possible for its price. 7:40
Compared with
  • Rolex Explorer 39mm: Offers the large Explorer aesthetic and legibility for much less money.
  • Timex Atelier Marine: Monta costs more but gets the bracelet right where Timex doesn't.
  • Rolex Submariner: Monta's clasp adjustment positions are clearer than the Submariner's.
  • Hamilton Khaki Field: Triumph does very well against mass-market field watches.
  • Seiko Alpinist: Triumph does very well against mass-market field watches.

Watch on YouTube

Relative Time

The New Monta Triumph For 2025 is...

Video, 15 minHands-on reviewOct 2025

PositiveRecommends

A well-made, refined watch with luxury-level finishing, a great bracelet and strong value, and one of the best Explorer alternatives at its price. The reviewer still prefers the original Triumph and regrets the loss of its originality.

Suits: Buyers wanting a refined, dressier Explorer-style sports watch at a moderate price

Disclosure: Brand loaner

What they said, point by point
Case & proportionspositive
  • Appreciates that lug-to-lug stayed around 47.5mm despite the wider case. 1:26
  • Considers 10.7mm thickness good, though 1mm thicker than the original. 1:55
Wearabilitypositive
  • Finds the fit practically ideal on a 7.25-inch wrist. 1:26
  • Notes a larger wrist presence from the size and design changes. 13:25
Finishing & buildpositive
  • Describes the fit and finish as near-luxury level. 2:52
  • Believes it stands up to watches costing about twice as much. 2:52
  • Highlights crisp transitions and beautiful polishing. 3:22
Dialpositive
  • Finds the low-reflection finish makes the indices stand out. 4:20
  • Calls the design classically beautiful and effective, if unoriginal. 4:50
  • Notes the black opaline dial readily shows dust and smudges. 6:16
  • Rates the lume as good, with a healthy application. 6:44
Bracelet & strappositive
  • Praises the bracelet's taper and Oyster-style design. 7:13
  • Likes the slightly sleeker redesigned clasp. 7:42
Designpositive
  • Sees it as more elegant and refined, closer to a dressy sports watch. 11:31
  • Notes the polished bezel is attention-grabbing. 13:54
  • Warns that the extensive polish means frequent wiping to stay clean. 6:44
Originalitynegative
  • Says it is not an outright homage but is clearly Explorer-inspired. 10:33
  • Mourns the loss of the original's creativity. 12:00
  • Nonetheless thinks the design shift is the right commercial decision. 12:28
Valuepositive
  • Considers the pre-order price great and full retail reasonable. 8:36
  • Calls it one of the best Explorer alternatives for the money. 13:54
Compared with
  • Monta Triumph (previous 38.5mm version): Prefers the original for its originality, rugged brushed finish and subtlety.
  • Rolex Explorer: Clear design inspiration; the new Triumph is a top Explorer alternative.

Watch on YouTube

Random Rob

Monta Triumph **NEW DESIGN** 40mm X 47mm

Video, 9 minHands-on reviewOct 2025

Very positiveRecommends

An enthusiastic take on the ground-up Triumph redesign. The reviewer praises its 40x47mm sizing, excellent bracelet and clasp, detailed dial and regulated movement, and says it feels like a watch costing far more. The only wish is for a no-date version.

Suits: Enthusiasts wanting a Goldilocks-sized, high-quality steel sports watch under $2,000

Disclosure: Brand loaner

What they said, point by point
Case & proportionspositive
  • Calls the 47mm lug-to-lug perfect, putting the watch in Goldilocks sizing. 1:55
  • Appreciates the slim thickness. 1:55
Wearabilitypositive
  • Strongly prefers this size on a 7.25-inch wrist. 6:15
  • Notes the dial makes it wear a touch larger than 40mm. 1:27
  • Describes the on-wrist fit as perfect. 6:44
Bracelet & strappositive
  • Ranks the bracelet among the best in the industry. 2:25
  • Likes the taper from 20mm down to about 16mm. 2:25
  • Finds the clasp secure and the tool-free micro-adjust easy to use. 2:55
Movementpositive
  • Regards the regulated SW300 base as a top-tier movement. 3:24
  • Values that any watchmaker can service it, which future-proofs the watch. 7:41
Dialpositive
  • Praises the diamond-cut hands and applied markers. 3:52
  • Finds the lume heavily and evenly applied. 8:37
  • Notes that the six o'clock date placement keeps the dial symmetrical. 4:20
  • Would prefer a no-date version, feeling the design deserves one. 4:49
Designpositive
  • Believes the watch's looks will be universally appreciated. 5:47
  • Calls the black dial perfect and a safe pick. 5:47
Finishing & buildpositive
  • Describes the build as very high quality. 1:55
  • Says the watch's strength lies in its fine details. 3:52
Functionalitypositive
  • Welcomes the upgrade from 150m to 200m, while noting few people need it. 3:24
Valuepositive
  • Welcomes the expected price drop from the previous model. 5:47
  • Would guess a $4,000–6,000 price from handling it. 7:12
  • Believes it outperforms its price point. 7:41
Originalitypositive
  • Notes this is an entirely new design, not an evolution of the old one. 8:10
  • Likes that the dial layout is traditional but has Monta character. 4:20
Compared with
  • Monta Triumph (previous generation): The new model is cheaper, more water resistant and a better size.

Watch on YouTube

Specifications

Reference
166BK00SP
Case
40mm, stainless steel
Thickness
10.5mm
Lug to lug
47.8mm
Movement
Monta M-22 (Sellita SW300 base) (automatic)
Power reserve
56 hours
Water resistance
200m
Crystal
flat beveled sapphire; display caseback
Bracelet or strap
steel bracelet with quick-adjust clasp (three micro-adjust settings)
Announced
October 2025
List price (US)
$1,850US retail $1,850 (aBlogtoWatch launch article

Creator Consensus is built only from what reviewers said. Prices, retailers and any commercial relationship never affect it. How consensus works