SJX Watches
Hands On: Rolex Yacht-Master II
ArticleHands-on reviewJun 2026Brandon Moore
PositiveRecommends
The reviewer sees the new Yacht-Master II as a major improvement on its predecessor, less ostentatious and technically stronger, with a much simpler countdown interface and top-class movement. It remains large and thick. The steel version is judged the more appealing, decent-value choice.
Suits: Contrarian collectors and chronograph enthusiasts drawn to the regatta countdown
Disclosure: Hands-on at launch event
What the review says, point by point
- Designpositive
- Sees the update as turning an unattractive model into a compelling chronograph.
- Credits the new model with toning down the ostentation of the original.
- Approves of moving the model branding from the bezel to a discreet spot on the flange.
- Dialpositive
- Likes the brilliant white textured dial for its sporty, instrument-like appearance.
- Finds the effect especially good on steel thanks to the red lacquered countdown hand and markers.
- Notes the raised countdown flange makes the watch look smaller.
- Case & proportionsmixed
- Considers the case big and thick enough that it best suits short-sleeved attire.
- Accepts the large size as fitting for a yachting-oriented watch.
- Finds it looks smaller than its predecessor despite near-identical dimensions.
- Functionalitypositive
- Praises reducing countdown programming from four steps to one via a single pusher.
- Finds the counterclockwise countdown intuitive and visually striking.
- Enjoys the backward-moving red seconds hand as a surprising, cool effect.
- Values the wider 300-degree countdown arc aligning with the hour markers.
- Movementpositive
- Regards the cal. 4162 as top-class, sharing the Daytona movement's best features.
- Finds the movement attractive for an industrial chronograph but hidden behind a solid caseback.
- Believes the reverse-running elapsed time will delight enthusiasts and win over reluctant collectors.
- Finishing & buildpositive
- Cites the high quality of make as part of the watch's appeal.
- Valuepositive
- Sees a decent value proposition given the movement's sophistication and build quality.
- Notes Rolex could charge more and finds its pricing restraint notable.
- Considers the steel model the more appealing option, partly for its lower price.
- Compared with
- Rolex Yacht-Master II (first generation, cal. 4161): New model improves on the original in every way, with less ostentation.
- Rolex Cosmograph Daytona (cal. 4131): Shares Daytona movement's best features but adds reverse-running elapsed time.
- Patek Philippe Worldtime ref. 5330G: Both use a raised flange that visually shrinks the dial.
