Bruce Williams
The Tudor release that surprised everyone - Is the Black Bay 68 necessary?
Video, 11 minHands-on reviewNov 2025
PositiveRecommends, with caveats
The reviewer finds the Black Bay 68 comfortable and refined for its size, praising the tapered Oyster-style bracelet, blue dial, bezel action and METAS movement. Poor anti-reflective coating is a near deal-breaker, and value is diminishing but still solid against rivals.
Suits: Fans of larger watches who want something that doesn't feel top-heavy or chunky
Disclosure: Retailer stock
What they said, point by point
- Case & proportionspositive
- Wearabilitypositive
- Bracelet & strappositive
- Likes the dramatic taper, which reduces weight on the wrist. 4:16
- Finds it cleaner and more streamlined than the faux-rivet bracelets without losing vintage character. 5:41
- Considers the Oyster-style bracelet with T-fit clasp hard to improve upon. 6:40
- Would like a five-link bracelet option in future for extra comfort. 10:00
- Dialmixed
- Highly enthusiastic about the deep, warm royal blue that looks unlike other blue Black Bays. 6:10
- Rates the lume as solid, long-lasting and potent. 7:08
- Finds the snowflake hour hand distinctive and legible, preferring it to Mercedes hands. 7:37
- Strongly dislikes the lack of or poor anti-reflective coating, causing distinct reflections. 9:30
- Functionalitypositive
- Praises the bezel action as very satisfying with great grip and feel. 6:40
- Movementpositive
- Versatilitypositive
- Calls it an ideal daily-wear sports watch. 8:05
- Valuemixed
- Originalitypositive
- Compared with
- Tudor Black Bay Bronze 43mm: The 68 is thinner, less slab-like and less hefty on the wrist.
- Tudor Black Bay 41: Wears very similarly; same height but feels proportionally thinner.
- Rolex Submariner No Date: About half the price but certainly not half the watch.
