Remontoir
Tudor Ranger
Always Go ClockWise Watch Vlogs: Very positiveWatch Ya Gonna Do About It: Very positiveAdrian Barker: Very positiveWorn & Wound: PositiveTeddy Baldassarre: PositiveBruce Williams: PositivePerpetual Passion: PositiveFratello: Mixed12and60: Mixed

Each marker on the ring is one counted review, coloured by its verdict.

Tudor

Ranger

M79950-000139mmautomatic$3,050 list priceAnnounced July 2022

Tudor's 2022 update of its explorer-style field watch: a satin-brushed 39mm steel case, a matte black dial with 3-6-9-12 numerals and a red-tipped seconds hand, and the in-house COSC-certified MT5402 movement. Reviewers usually compare it with the Rolex Explorer.

Tudor product page

Creator Consensus

Creator Consensus

Positive

9 reviews: 7 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative. 9 of 9 recommend it.

Every reviewer recommends the Ranger, and nearly all see it as strong value. Most praise the T-fit clasp's micro-adjustment, the 39mm case size and its comfort across wrist sizes, and most regard it as a versatile everyday tool watch. Several also credit the in-house calibre and the solid build quality.

Where they differ. The dial is the main split. Several find it clean and legible, with warm lume and flat printed markers that suit the watch, while several others find the print too plain and flat, and a couple dislike the hour hand's shape.

Most praised

  • Strong value for the money8 of 9
    • Perpetual Passion Lists excellent value for money among the watch's strengths.excellent value for moneyRead it in context
    • 12and60 Sees the bracelet price as a tempting value.a pretty tempting value propositionRead it in context
    • 12and60 Calls it a no-brainer at the price given clasp, movement and finishing.something of a no-brainer at this price pointRead it in context
    • Watch Ya Gonna Do About It Calls it exceptional value, especially for slim-to-medium wrists.providing those with slim to medium-sized wrists with exceptional value for moneyRead it in context
    • Watch Ya Gonna Do About It Considers the entry price an excellent offering.subsequently becomes an excellent offeringRead it in context
    • Watch Ya Gonna Do About It Even against the pricier Railmaster Trilogy, rates it exceptional value.the 79950 Tudor Ranger 2022 offering is exceptional value for money againRead it in context
    • Bruce Williams Considers it good value at around $3,000 on the bracelet with T-fit and the movement.this is only three thousand dollars on a bracelet and it has t fitWatch from 2:52
    • Bruce Williams Feels it arrives at the right size, price and movement for a field watch.at the right size at the right price with the right movementWatch from 0:27
    • Adrian Barker Calls the price remarkable given the in-house movement, build and heritage.the price is absolutely nutsWatch from 3:22
    • Adrian Barker Finds the £2,420 bracelet price amazing.2 420 pounds for this watch i think isWatch from 3:22
    • Adrian Barker Appreciates such a well-engineered extension clasp at this price level.it is nice to see a watch of this price levelWatch from 4:19
    • Always Go ClockWise Watch Vlogs Still regards it as among the best value available despite the increase.is still one of the best value aroundWatch from 7:33
    • Always Go ClockWise Watch Vlogs Feels little competes with it under five thousand dollars.there's not a lot that goes around for less than five grandWatch from 7:33
    • Worn & Wound Thinks the in-house COSC movement and specs make it a lot of watch for the price.it's a lot to watch for the moneyWatch from 3:46
    • Worn & Wound Regards the price as approachable.it's at an approachable price point relatively speakingWatch from 7:07
    • Teddy Baldassarre Considers the watch well positioned at its roughly $3,000 price.it's well positioned for $3,000Watch from 14:35
    • Teddy Baldassarre Sees it as an enticing Explorer-like option at less than half the price.at less than half the price with an unquestionable similar approachWatch from 5:54
  • T-fit clasp offers excellent micro-adjustment7 of 9
    • Perpetual Passion Calls the tapered bracelet with the T-Fit clasp the best idea Tudor has had.with the new T-Fit is simply the best that Tudor has ever thoughtRead it in context
    • 12and60 Welcomes the T-fit micro-adjustment as an improvement over earlier bracelets.These changes are very welcome upgrades over the previous generation of braceletsRead it in context
    • Watch Ya Gonna Do About It Values the micro-adjustable T-clasp.the T-clasp with micro-adjustment is very welcomeRead it in context
    • Adrian Barker Praises the thin, short T-fit clasp and its well-engineered on-the-fly extension.such a well engineered on-the-fly bracelet extensionWatch from 4:19
    • Always Go ClockWise Watch Vlogs Finds the T-fit clasp a joy to wear, very adjustable and comfortable.very adjustable it's so comfortableWatch from 5:11
    • Always Go ClockWise Watch Vlogs Praises the clasp's milling quality.that t-fit clasp so beautifully milledWatch from 5:38
    • Always Go ClockWise Watch Vlogs Values on-the-fly adjustment when the wrist swells in hot weather.you can always adjust it on the FlyWatch from 6:36
    • Worn & Wound Values the T-fit clasp for quick adjustment, a feature the Explorer lacks.they've got the the t-fit uh clasp for quick adjustmentsWatch from 4:15
    • Teddy Baldassarre Finds the T-fit micro-adjustment works very well, if slightly less refined than Rolex's Glidelock.tutor's t fit still works impressively well in practiceWatch from 6:24
  • The 39mm case size is just right6 of 9
    • 12and60 Acknowledges the 39mm size appeals to many buyers.Its size is one that appeals to manyRead it in context
    • Bruce Williams Thinks Tudor got the size and thinness right.obviously a great job with the size how thin this isWatch from 4:45
    • Adrian Barker Expects buyers to appreciate the 39mm size.people will enjoy the fact it's 39 millimetersWatch from 2:53
    • Always Go ClockWise Watch Vlogs Calls the 39mm case a perfect Goldilocks size.39 millimeter uh size is a perfect Goldilocks size for meWatch from 9:25
    • Worn & Wound Prefers the 39mm case over the previous 42mm size.I definitely prefer the 39 over the previous size which was 42Watch from 0:28
    • Teddy Baldassarre Sees 39mm as a good size that splits the difference between the vintage and 41mm versions.I do think 39 mm is a good sizeWatch from 12:40
  • Comfortable and balanced across wrist sizes6 of 9
    • Perpetual Passion Finds it really comfortable when worn.Once worn it is really comfortable.Read it in context
    • Perpetual Passion Considers the fit of the new model very interesting.the fit of this new one Ranger It's very interestingRead it in context
    • Watch Ya Gonna Do About It Sits well on the reviewer's 16.25cm wrist, bold yet not overpowering.On my 16.25cm wrist, the Tudor Ranger 2022 sits very nicelyRead it in context
    • Watch Ya Gonna Do About It Considers it comfortable for many wrist sizes.can be worn comfortably by a larger audience with varying wrist sizesRead it in context
    • Bruce Williams Credits Tudor with how well the watch wears.Watch from 4:45
    • Adrian Barker Disliked it in photos but found it felt good and solid on the wrist.when i put on the wrist it just feels good it feels solidWatch from 2:53
    • Always Go ClockWise Watch Vlogs Finds it balanced rather than top heavy on the wrist.not top heavy it just Blends in your wristWatch from 9:53
    • Teddy Baldassarre Finds the new case much more wearable, suiting a broader range of wrist sizes.it is now housed within a much more wearable case and upgraded braceletWatch from 4:28
  • Versatile all-rounder for most occasions6 of 9
    • Perpetual Passion Notes that a plain 39mm is hard to make versatile, but says Tudor succeeded.it is not always easy to make a 39mm so versatileRead it in context
    • Watch Ya Gonna Do About It Describes it as tough, legible and discreet luxury.can take the beating, is very legible, and is under-the-radar luxuryRead it in context
    • Bruce Williams Feels the design language suits bracelet, fabric, rubber or NATO straps.this is a very versatile watch in terms of design languageWatch from 5:14
    • Always Go ClockWise Watch Vlogs Says it suits everything from smart casual to formal clothing.it goes well with everything blends with uh from smart casual to to formalWatch from 3:46
    • Always Go ClockWise Watch Vlogs Considers it the perfect work watch.it's the perfect work watchWatch from 3:46
    • Always Go ClockWise Watch Vlogs Describes it as a go-anywhere, do-anything watch.go anywhere do everything do anything watchWatch from 11:18
    • Worn & Wound Sees it as a great basic all-rounder.just kind of a great basic all-arounderWatch from 6:09
    • Teddy Baldassarre Believes it offers maximum versatility and works in almost every scenario.you're getting maximum versatility you're getting something that's going to pretty much workWatch from 13:38
  • Tapered Oyster-style bracelet is excellent5 of 9
    • 12and60 Likes the more streamlined brushed oyster-style bracelet without fake rivets.a much more streamlined oyster-style with a brushed finishRead it in context
    • Adrian Barker Calls the bracelet a standout, near perfect and free of faux rivets.the bracelet on this thing is near enough perfectWatch from 3:51
    • Always Go ClockWise Watch Vlogs Likes that the Oyster bracelet is recognisable without being flashy like a jubilee.recognizable yet not screamingWatch from 4:42
    • Worn & Wound Describes the tapered Oyster-style bracelet as lovely.it's a very lovely oyster kind of tapered braceletWatch from 4:15
    • Worn & Wound The bracelet taper frames the watch well on the wrist.they do a great job with the taper on the braceletWatch from 7:07
    • Teddy Baldassarre Considers the bracelet exceptional and class-leading at its price point.an exceptional bracelet that I'd argue is class leadingWatch from 6:51
Show 17 more
  • In-house calibre is a major strength5 of 9
    • 12and60 Considers the movement fully sufficient for typical use.the Ranger offers everything the average user needs in a watchRead it in context
    • 12and60 Approves of Tudor using in-house rather than third-party calibres.good to see Tudor continuing to forgo third-party movements in favour of in-house calibresRead it in context
    • Watch Ya Gonna Do About It Credits the manufacture calibre with a better power reserve and COSC precision.Manufacture Calibre MT5402 which provides a better power reserveRead it in context
    • Adrian Barker Believes the movement outperforms many rivals in its price range.a movement that will outperform many watches within this price rangeWatch from 2:24
    • Always Go ClockWise Watch Vlogs Describes the in-house movement as superb.the in-house movement is superbWatch from 8:28
    • Teddy Baldassarre Views the in-house movement as a major upgrade and one of the strongest reasons to buy.the mt542 is a big upgrade and probably is one of the biggest argumentsWatch from 8:18
  • Solid build and quality craftsmanship5 of 9
    • Fratello Enjoys the solid, weighty build and crown operation.The build is solid and on the heavy side, inspiring confidence.Read it in context
    • 12and60 Cites Tudor's finishing quality as contributing to strong value.the quality of Tudor’s finishing make this something of a no-brainerRead it in context
    • Bruce Williams Sees crisp execution on the dial even at a macro level.I think there is a crisp level of execution onWatch from 3:21
    • Adrian Barker Lists the solid build among the watch's strengths.in-house movement solid build brilliant heritageWatch from 3:51
    • Always Go ClockWise Watch Vlogs Praises the stainless steel finish and overall craftsmanship.the finish of the stainless steel the craftsmanship it's really very goodWatch from 8:00
  • Clean, uncluttered and legible dial4 of 9
    • 12and60 Finds the layout very clean and legible, fitting for a tool watch.exceptionally clean and legible, which is just what you want in a tool watchRead it in context
    • Watch Ya Gonna Do About It Welcomes the reduced dial text and red limited to the seconds-hand tip.I appreciate the reduction of the textRead it in context
    • Bruce Williams Likes the simplified dial with open space and minimal text.I like how clean that is I like that there's some real estateWatch from 3:50
    • Always Go ClockWise Watch Vlogs Says the uncluttered dial with large numerals makes it look bigger than 39mm.it's not a crowded dial the big 3 6 9 12 really compensate for itWatch from 10:22
  • Warm-toned lume feels deliberate and attractive3 of 9
    • Watch Ya Gonna Do About It Finds the fauxtina-toned indices very legible on the matte black base.almost yellowish fauxtina indices sit very legiblyRead it in context
    • Bruce Williams Considers the lume very good and appreciates its greenish tone.this has more of a green Hue in natural light and in low light very good LoomWatch from 3:50
    • Worn & Wound The yellowish lume feels like a deliberate, intentional choice.it definitely feels intentionalWatch from 1:54
  • Flat printed markers suit the watch3 of 9
    • Watch Ya Gonna Do About It Finds the flatter lume treatment more modern than the old raised pips.the Tudor Ranger 2022 is more flatRead it in context
    • Bruce Williams Has no issue with printed rather than applied markers.I have no problem with the printed Loom I like the green toneWatch from 5:44
    • Worn & Wound Flat painted markers suit the flat brushed finish of the case and bracelet.the flatness of the markers kind of pairs with the the the flatness of theWatch from 2:22
  • Clean, simple tool-watch aesthetic3 of 9
    • Perpetual Passion Finds the look clean, simple and smooth, with the right tool-watch character.It's clean, simple, smooth and they gave that right tool-watch touchRead it in context
    • 12and60 Sees the brushed, clean design as a functional aesthetic distinct from other Tudors.a very functional no-fuss aesthetic that sets it apart from Tudor’s other watchesRead it in context
    • Teddy Baldassarre Personally likes the design and dismisses the 'boring' criticism as invalid for a field-style watch.like the design of this watchWatch from 9:44
    • Teddy Baldassarre Finds the overall style clean, legible and true to the model's history.as a whole the style still feels very clean it's legibleWatch from 4:28
  • Honours the Ranger's heritage well3 of 9
    • Perpetual Passion Believes the watch honours its link with the past excellently.Tudor has demonstrated that link with the past in an excellent wayRead it in context
    • Bruce Williams Appreciates a historically rich design rather than another Black Bay.we're not getting another black Bay we're not getting snowflake handsWatch from 0:27
    • Bruce Williams Thinks it rightly differentiates itself and stays true to Ranger roots.really stay true to the ranger roots that have been around for decadesWatch from 5:44
    • Adrian Barker Praises the brand's heritage and history behind the model.brilliant heritage brilliant historyWatch from 3:51
    • Adrian Barker Credits Tudor with executing vintage styling well.it has that vintage styling about it and that is something that tudor nailsWatch from 5:45
  • Best bought and worn on the bracelet2 of 9
    • Adrian Barker Feels the watch suits the bracelet best, looking and feeling more solid.i actually think this watch just suits being on a braceletWatch from 4:48
    • Worn & Wound Strongly recommends buying the watch on the bracelet.I highly recommend getting it on the braceletWatch from 6:38
  • Long power reserve is practical2 of 9
    • Watch Ya Gonna Do About It Considers the 70-hour power reserve impressive.offers an impressive 70-hour power reserveRead it in context
    • Always Go ClockWise Watch Vlogs Finds the 70-hour power reserve convenient for rotating watches without rewinding.because it's a 70 hour power Reserve uh you don't have to wear it every dayWatch from 8:57
  • Tested examples run very accurately2 of 9
    • Always Go ClockWise Watch Vlogs Reports accuracy of about plus one second.this one runs about plus one secondWatch from 8:28
    • Teddy Baldassarre Reports the tested example ran well within COSC tolerances.kept time between min-1 to plus2 seconds a dayWatch from 8:46
  • Red-tipped seconds hand adds subtle colour2 of 9
    • 12and60 Likes the red-tipped seconds hand as a touch of colour.The seconds hand has a red tip too, which adds a nice pop of colourRead it in context
    • Bruce Williams Enjoys the subtle red on the seconds hand.I like the slight use of red on the running seconds handWatch from 4:17
  • Understated look without seeking attention2 of 9
    • Watch Ya Gonna Do About It Appreciates the more understated look that fits Tudor's modern range.more understated, more minimalistic, and more in time with what Tudor wants to offerRead it in context
    • Always Go ClockWise Watch Vlogs Appreciates that the design is subtle rather than attention-seeking, yet still stylish.it's not a very attention-seeking watch yet it's very stylishWatch from 4:15
  • Stands on its own beside the Explorer2 of 9
    • Watch Ya Gonna Do About It Praises it as a model that knows its role alongside Rolex's Explorer.a well-evolved model that knows its place in the order of thingsRead it in context
    • Watch Ya Gonna Do About It Considers its offering unique within the field-watch market.Read the review
    • Teddy Baldassarre Feels the watch stands on its own merits beyond being an Explorer alternative.I think this watch stands on its own as just being a cool watchWatch from 14:35
  • Fully brushed finish works without feeling dull2 of 9
    • Bruce Williams Feels the brushed surfaces still catch light, so a single finish doesn't feel boring.this still has some light play there are reflections coming off of the grainingWatch from 4:45
    • Bruce Williams Believes owners won't miss a polished bezel.I think Tudor did a great job with the FinishWatch from 4:45
    • Worn & Wound The fully brushed satin finish is the first thing that stands out.the first thing I kind of uh pops out to me is the finish of the watchWatch from 0:28
  • Robust, easy-to-use tool watch2 of 9
    • Perpetual Passion Highlights ease of use and robustness as key appeals, and lists robustness as a like.the ease of use, the simplicity of the lines and the robustness of the watchRead it in context
    • 12and60 Finds it very tool-like, backed by solid specifications.the new Tudor Ranger feels very toolishRead it in context
  • Thin case wraps the wrist well1 of 9
    • Perpetual Passion Describes the case as very thin and wrapping the wrist well.is very thin, perfectly wraps the wristRead it in context
  • Polished bevels add depth to the case1 of 9
    • Perpetual Passion Feels the polished bevels add three-dimensionality that a fully satin case would lack.gives the wrist a three-dimensionality that would have been lostRead it in context
    • Perpetual Passion Believes the polished accents embellish the whole watch.that polish gave another flavor, it managed to embellish the entire watchRead it in context

Most criticised

  • Dial print feels overly plain and flat3 of 9
    • Perpetual Passion Lists an overly plain dial finish as the main dislike.Dial too simple in the finishesRead it in context
    • 12and60 Calls the dial the biggest disappointment, with overly simple print and hands.the design just looks incredibly bland and lazyRead it in context
    • Teddy Baldassarre Considers the printed dial flat and one-dimensional, and thinks raised markers would help.I think some raised markers would definitely helpWatch from 10:12
  • Hour hand shape is unappealing2 of 9
    • Adrian Barker Dislikes the hour hand and would have preferred a snowflake hand.i'm really not a fan of that hour handWatch from 5:17
    • Worn & Wound One reviewer dislikes the shape of the snowflake-style hour hand.I'm not fond of that shape of our handWatch from 4:44
  • Numerals and typography look awkward1 of 9
    • Fratello Felt the 3-6-9 dial looked wrong from first sight.The dial didn’t look right to me.Read it in context
    • Fratello Relays and endorses a typography expert's view that the curved numerals look fragmented and unnatural.This results in a fragmented aesthetic, where the curves feel clumsy and unnatural.Read it in context
    • Fratello Dislikes the basic Arial font for the 'Geneve' and 'Ranger' text versus the original's hand-rendered type.Adding insult to injury, the “Geneve” and “Ranger” lines are in basic Arial.Read it in context
  • Too easily mistaken for cheaper homages1 of 9
    • 12and60 Thinks the simplicity makes it look indistinguishable from homage watches.the watch looks as though any homage brand could have made itRead it in context
    • 12and60 Wants small details to set it apart from cheaper alternatives.the dial is crying out for a few small detailsRead it in context
  • Lacks effective anti-reflective coating1 of 9
    • Bruce Williams Names the absence of good anti-reflective treatment as the main negative.there is no good anti-reflective treatmentWatch from 6:11
    • Bruce Williams Argues a functional field watch needs AR coating to approach perfection.I think this does need the arcWatch from 6:40

Open a point to see who said it and jump to that moment in their review.

By aspect

PositiveMixedNegative

How reviewers judged each aspect; one square per reviewer who discussed it
DialMixed
Case & proportionsPraised
WearabilityPraised
ValuePraised
Bracelet & strapPraised
Finishing & buildPraised
DesignPraised
VersatilityPraised
OriginalityMostly liked
MovementPraised
FunctionalityDivided

Was this consensus useful?

The reviews

9 counted, 3 more for context

Remontoir summarises; the reviewers did the work. Watch and read the originals for the full picture.

Fratello

Hands-On With The Tudor Ranger 39mm And 36mm In Beige And Black

ArticleHands-on reviewFeb 2026Thomas Van Straaten

MixedRecommends, with caveats

Finds the Ranger solid, dependable and pleasant to wear with an excellent bracelet, but is let down by crude, sharp-edged finishing and clumsy dial typography. Still considers it a rather good watch whose flaws won't bother most buyers.

Suits: Buyers wanting a solid field watch with a modern sports feel in 39mm

What the review says, point by point
Dialnegative
  • Felt the 3-6-9 dial looked wrong from first sight.
  • Relays and endorses a typography expert's view that the curved numerals look fragmented and unnatural.
  • Dislikes the basic Arial font for the 'Geneve' and 'Ranger' text versus the original's hand-rendered type.
  • Believes the dial issues won't bother most potential buyers.
Finishing & buildmixed
  • Enjoys the solid, weighty build and crown operation.

Read on fratellowatches.com

Always Go ClockWise Watch Vlogs

Tudor Ranger 2022 Long term review: Why this Field Watch is a definite keeper! Model #M79950-0001

Video, 13 minOwner's reviewAug 2023

Very positiveRecommends

After about a year of ownership, the reviewer calls the Ranger a keeper. Highlights include its subtle Explorer-like styling, the adjustable T-fit clasp, strong value, an accurate 70-hour movement, an ideal 39mm size and broad versatility. The reviewer acknowledges the design is polarising.

Suits: Anyone wanting a subtle, versatile work or field watch for daily wear

Disclosure: Reviewer owns it

What they said, point by point
Designpositive
  • Appreciates that the design is subtle rather than attention-seeking, yet still stylish. 4:15
  • Values its timeless, Explorer-type look. 4:15
  • Acknowledges the design is polarising and not for everyone. 12:18
Dialpositive
  • Says the uncluttered dial with large numerals makes it look bigger than 39mm. 10:22
Bracelet & strappositive
  • Finds the T-fit clasp a joy to wear, very adjustable and comfortable. 5:11
  • Praises the clasp's milling quality. 5:38
  • Values on-the-fly adjustment when the wrist swells in hot weather. 6:36
  • Likes that the Oyster bracelet is recognisable without being flashy like a jubilee. 4:42
Valuepositive
  • Notes the price has risen since purchase. 7:04
  • Still regards it as among the best value available despite the increase. 7:33
  • Feels little competes with it under five thousand dollars. 7:33
Movementpositive
  • Describes the in-house movement as superb. 8:28
  • Reports accuracy of about plus one second. 8:28
  • Finds the 70-hour power reserve convenient for rotating watches without rewinding. 8:57
Finishing & buildpositive
  • Praises the stainless steel finish and overall craftsmanship. 8:00
Case & proportionspositive
  • Calls the 39mm case a perfect Goldilocks size. 9:25
Wearabilitypositive
  • Notes it slips under long-sleeve cuffs. 9:25
  • Finds it balanced rather than top heavy on the wrist. 9:53
Versatilitypositive
  • Says it suits everything from smart casual to formal clothing. 3:46
  • Considers it the perfect work watch. 3:46
  • Describes it as a go-anywhere, do-anything watch. 11:18
Compared with
  • Rolex Explorer II: Ranger's 70-hour reserve beats the Explorer II's roughly 48 hours.
  • Omega Speedmaster (42mm): Ranger's large numerals make it look similar in size to the 42mm Speedmaster.

Watch on YouTube

Worn & Wound

Rolex or Tudor? Finding the Right Size | Review: Tudor Ranger

Video, 9 minHands-on reviewJan 2023

PositiveRecommends

Two editors find the 39mm Ranger a sharp, straightforward, well-priced field watch with pleasing brushed finishing and an excellent tapered bracelet. They see it as less refined and dressy than the Explorer, and one dislikes the snowflake hour hand.

Suits: Field watch fans wanting a Tudor to fill a collection gap

What they said, point by point
Case & proportionspositive
  • Prefers the 39mm case over the previous 42mm size. 0:28
  • Notes the horizontally brushed, slab-like sides but finds the case thin enough. 8:05
Finishing & buildmixed
  • The fully brushed satin finish is the first thing that stands out. 0:28
  • Notes that nearly every surface, including the lug chamfers, is brushed. 0:56
  • Finds the Explorer's polished surfaces give it more refinement than the Ranger. 7:37
Dialmixed
  • The yellowish lume feels like a deliberate, intentional choice. 1:54
  • Flat painted markers suit the flat brushed finish of the case and bracelet. 2:22
  • One reviewer dislikes the shape of the snowflake-style hour hand. 4:44
  • The distinctive hour hand adds character to an otherwise conservative design. 5:41
Designpositive
  • Describes it as a classically styled basic tool watch without flashy elements. 1:25
  • Feels it has sufficient character despite its conservative look. 6:38
  • Less exciting than some recent Tudor releases, which the reviewers find acceptable. 6:09
Wearabilitymixed
  • Expects it to wear smaller because the face is mostly dial. 3:20
  • Next to a 36mm Explorer it feels almost large, which the reviewer considers fine. 4:15
Bracelet & strappositive
  • Describes the tapered Oyster-style bracelet as lovely. 4:15
  • Values the T-fit clasp for quick adjustment, a feature the Explorer lacks. 4:15
  • Strongly recommends buying the watch on the bracelet. 6:38
  • The bracelet taper frames the watch well on the wrist. 7:07
Valuepositive
  • Thinks the in-house COSC movement and specs make it a lot of watch for the price. 3:46
  • Regards the price as approachable. 7:07
Versatilitymixed
  • Sees it as a great basic all-rounder. 6:09
  • Doubts it could be worn with a suit the way an Explorer can. 8:05
  • Views it as a more niche field watch than the Explorer. 8:35
Compared with
  • Rolex Explorer 36mm: Explorer more refined with polished surfaces and dressier.
  • Rolex Explorer 36mm: Ranger is less than half the price and has a T-fit clasp.
  • Rolex Explorer 39mm: Ranger fills the gap left by the discontinued 39mm Explorer.

Watch on YouTube

Watch Ya Gonna Do About It

Tudor Ranger 2022 Hands-on Review: Perfect Part Of The Bigger Picture That Ventures Beyond The Obvious Horizon

ArticleHands-on reviewDec 2022Joseph Rana

Very positiveRecommends

Sees the 2022 Ranger as a well-judged evolution of the Heritage Ranger, with a cleaner dial, better proportions, a manufacture COSC movement and a micro-adjust clasp. Calls it exceptional value that fills the gap left by the 39mm Explorer.

Suits: Swiss-watch newcomers wanting a durable, legible, understated field watch for slim-to-medium wrists

Disclosure: Retailer stock

What the review says, point by point
Dialpositive
  • Welcomes the reduced dial text and red limited to the seconds-hand tip.
  • Finds the flatter lume treatment more modern than the old raised pips.
  • Finds the fauxtina-toned indices very legible on the matte black base.
Designpositive
  • Considers the update a welcome evolution rather than a radical change.
  • Appreciates the more understated look that fits Tudor's modern range.
Case & proportionspositive
  • Sees the 20mm lug width as better proportioned than the previous 22mm.
Wearabilitypositive
  • Sits well on the reviewer's 16.25cm wrist, bold yet not overpowering.
  • Considers it comfortable for many wrist sizes.
Bracelet & strappositive
  • Values the micro-adjustable T-clasp.
Movementpositive
  • Credits the manufacture calibre with a better power reserve and COSC precision.
  • Considers the 70-hour power reserve impressive.
Versatilitypositive
  • Describes it as tough, legible and discreet luxury.
Originalitypositive
  • Praises it as a model that knows its role alongside Rolex's Explorer.
  • Considers its offering unique within the field-watch market.
Valuepositive
  • Calls it exceptional value, especially for slim-to-medium wrists.
  • Considers the entry price an excellent offering.
  • Even against the pricier Railmaster Trilogy, rates it exceptional value.
Compared with
  • Tudor Heritage Ranger 79910: New model upgrades nearly every aspect: size, dial, movement, clasp.
  • Hamilton Khaki Field: Solid entry point but lacks the clean 3-6-9-12 dial and branding.
  • Sinn 556A: Excellent cheaper alternative, but date window, Sellita and shorter warranty.
  • Sinn 856: Closer match but Sellita movement, shorter warranty and intrusive date window.
  • Bell & Ross BR 03-92: Square 42mm case wears too big and has a date window.
  • Longines Conquest L3.777.4.58.6: Great cheaper alternative with similar power reserve but feels very different.
  • Longines Spirit 37: Another great alternative at similar price.
  • Omega Railmaster 1957 Trilogy: Beats the Ranger in most aspects but costs far more.

Read on watchyagonnadoaboutit.com

Teddy Baldassarre

Tudor Ranger 39mm Review

Video, 16 minHands-on reviewAug 2022

PositiveRecommends

Sees the new 39mm Ranger as a well-executed, well-priced revival. The downsized case, excellent T-fit bracelet and COSC MT5402 movement are big upgrades, though the flat printed dial and below-par lume hold it back slightly.

Suits: First luxury watch buyers wanting a versatile non-diver; Explorer fans

What they said, point by point
Designpositive
  • Personally likes the design and dismisses the 'boring' criticism as invalid for a field-style watch. 9:44
  • Finds the overall style clean, legible and true to the model's history. 4:28
Dialmixed
  • Considers the printed dial flat and one-dimensional, and thinks raised markers would help. 10:12
  • Rates the lume as slightly below average by Tudor's own standards. 10:12
  • Notes the lume has an unexpected yellow-green tint rather than typical faux-patina. 10:41
  • Appreciates the absence of a date, given the watch's field orientation. 4:28
Case & proportionspositive
  • Sees 39mm as a good size that splits the difference between the vintage and 41mm versions. 12:40
  • Notes the thin bezel makes the dial look larger, so it wears like a true 40mm. 5:26
Wearabilitypositive
  • Finds the new case much more wearable, suiting a broader range of wrist sizes. 4:28
Bracelet & strappositive
  • Considers the bracelet exceptional and class-leading at its price point. 6:51
  • Finds the T-fit micro-adjustment works very well, if slightly less refined than Rolex's Glidelock. 6:24
  • Is not bothered by the riveted bracelet styling that some dislike. 13:09
Movementpositive
  • Views the in-house movement as a major upgrade and one of the strongest reasons to buy. 8:18
  • Reports the tested example ran well within COSC tolerances. 8:46
Valuepositive
  • Considers the watch well positioned at its roughly $3,000 price. 14:35
  • Sees it as an enticing Explorer-like option at less than half the price. 5:54
  • Notes many competing watches occupy the same niche. 10:41
Versatilitypositive
  • Believes it offers maximum versatility and works in almost every scenario. 13:38
Originalitypositive
  • Notes it fills the 39mm Explorer role that Rolex vacated. 5:54
  • Feels the watch stands on its own merits beyond being an Explorer alternative. 14:35
Compared with
  • Rolex Explorer 214270 (39mm): Ranger offers a similar approach at under half the price.
  • Rolex Glidelock clasp: T-fit is slightly less refined but works impressively well.
  • Tudor Black Bay 36: Black Bay 36 has raised markers and better lume.
  • Tudor Heritage Ranger (41mm, 2014): New model is more wearable, with an upgraded bracelet and movement.
  • Tudor Black Bay 58: BB58's rotating bezel helps it wear smaller; Ranger wears like 40mm.

Watch on YouTube

Bruce Williams

Too Boring? Hands on with the Tudor Ranger

Video, 8 minHands-on reviewJul 2022

PositiveRecommends, with caveats

The reviewer handled the Ranger at a dealer and believes it looks much better in person than in renderings. They praise the clean dial, predominantly brushed finishing, size, versatility and price. The lack of anti-reflective coating is named as the biggest drawback for a field watch.

Suits: Buyers wanting a simple, historically rooted field watch rather than another Black Bay

Disclosure: Retailer stock

What they said, point by point
Dialpositive
  • Likes the simplified dial with open space and minimal text. 3:50
  • Considers the lume very good and appreciates its greenish tone. 3:50
  • Enjoys the subtle red on the seconds hand. 4:17
  • Has no issue with printed rather than applied markers. 5:44
Finishing & buildpositive
  • Sees crisp execution on the dial even at a macro level. 3:21
  • Feels the brushed surfaces still catch light, so a single finish doesn't feel boring. 4:45
  • Believes owners won't miss a polished bezel. 4:45
Case & proportionspositive
  • Thinks Tudor got the size and thinness right. 4:45
Wearabilitypositive
  • Credits Tudor with how well the watch wears. 4:45
Versatilitypositive
  • Feels the design language suits bracelet, fabric, rubber or NATO straps. 5:14
Originalitypositive
  • Appreciates a historically rich design rather than another Black Bay. 0:27
  • Thinks it rightly differentiates itself and stays true to Ranger roots. 5:44
Functionalitynegative
  • Names the absence of good anti-reflective treatment as the main negative. 6:11
  • Argues a functional field watch needs AR coating to approach perfection. 6:40
Valuepositive
  • Considers it good value at around $3,000 on the bracelet with T-fit and the movement. 2:52
  • Feels it arrives at the right size, price and movement for a field watch. 0:27
Compared with
  • Rolex Explorer: Sees the Ranger as what the Explorer used to be decades ago.
  • Tudor Black Bay 41/36: Those who want applied markers and polish already have the Black Bay.

Watch on YouTube

12and60

The Tudor Ranger 79950 – My Biggest Disappointment Of 2022

ArticleHands-on reviewJul 2022James Mulvale

MixedRecommends, with caveats

The reviewer was underwhelmed on handling the Ranger, finding the dial bland and lacking detail that signals a high-end watch. Still, the bracelet, in-house movement, finishing and price make it a strong value for anyone who likes the design.

Suits: Those who like its plain design, miss the 39mm Explorer, or prefer larger watches

Disclosure: Hands-on at launch event

What the review says, point by point
Dialmixed
  • Finds the layout very clean and legible, fitting for a tool watch.
  • Likes the red-tipped seconds hand as a touch of colour.
  • Calls the dial the biggest disappointment, with overly simple print and hands.
  • Lume is less bright than some other Tudors but still readable at night.
Designmixed
  • Sees the brushed, clean design as a functional aesthetic distinct from other Tudors.
  • Feels nothing in the design draws the eye or signals a high-end watch.
Originalitynegative
  • Thinks the simplicity makes it look indistinguishable from homage watches.
  • Wants small details to set it apart from cheaper alternatives.
Case & proportionsmixed
  • Would personally have preferred a smaller case size.
  • Acknowledges the 39mm size appeals to many buyers.
Wearabilitypositive
  • Wears well overall but slightly large given the fixed bezel and wide dial.
Bracelet & strappositive
  • Likes the more streamlined brushed oyster-style bracelet without fake rivets.
  • Welcomes the T-fit micro-adjustment as an improvement over earlier bracelets.
Movementpositive
  • Considers the movement fully sufficient for typical use.
  • Approves of Tudor using in-house rather than third-party calibres.
Functionalitypositive
  • Finds it very tool-like, backed by solid specifications.
Finishing & buildpositive
  • Cites Tudor's finishing quality as contributing to strong value.
Valuepositive
  • Sees the bracelet price as a tempting value.
  • Calls it a no-brainer at the price given clasp, movement and finishing.
Compared with
  • Rolex Explorer (current): Explorer refined its dial with applied numerals and gloss finish; Ranger lacks that.
  • Tudor Black Bay Pro: Suggests Ranger could have used Black Bay Pro-style 3D lume markers.
  • Rolex Explorer 39mm: Ranger is a great alternative for those missing the 39mm Explorer.
  • Tudor Black Bay 36: On the surface the Ranger seems a better Explorer alternative than the BB36.

Read on 12and60.com

Perpetual Passion

Hands on | Tudor Ranger 39mm ref. 79950

ArticleHands-on reviewJul 2022Pasquale Rinaldi

PositiveRecommends, with caveats

A small-case enthusiast finds the 39mm Ranger comfortable and well proportioned. The reviewer praises the satin-and-polish case finishing, the tapered T-Fit bracelet and the value for money, but considers the dial too simply finished.

Suits: Lovers of smaller, simple and robust tool watches

What the review says, point by point
Designpositive
  • Finds the look clean, simple and smooth, with the right tool-watch character.
Dialnegative
  • Lists an overly plain dial finish as the main dislike.
Case & proportionspositive
  • Considers the lug shape and case middle well balanced.
  • Describes the case as very thin and wrapping the wrist well.
Finishing & buildpositive
  • Feels the polished bevels add three-dimensionality that a fully satin case would lack.
  • Believes the polished accents embellish the whole watch.
Wearabilitypositive
  • Finds it really comfortable when worn.
  • Says the proportions hide the 39mm diameter well.
  • Considers the fit of the new model very interesting.
Bracelet & strappositive
  • Calls the tapered bracelet with the T-Fit clasp the best idea Tudor has had.
Versatilitypositive
  • Notes that a plain 39mm is hard to make versatile, but says Tudor succeeded.
Functionalitypositive
  • Highlights ease of use and robustness as key appeals, and lists robustness as a like.
Originalitypositive
  • Believes the watch honours its link with the past excellently.
Valuepositive
  • Lists excellent value for money among the watch's strengths.

Read on perpetualpassion.com

Adrian Barker

Hands on: NEW Tudor Ranger 2022

Video, 7 minFirst lookJul 2022

Very positiveRecommends

After only minutes with the watch at Tudor's launch event, the reviewer is won over despite disliking it in photos. The price, solid movement and near-perfect T-fit bracelet stand out. The only gripes are the hour hand and the 12 numeral.

Suits: Fans of simple tool watches wanting a 39mm Explorer-style watch

Disclosure: Hands-on at launch event

What they said, point by point
Valuepositive
  • Calls the price remarkable given the in-house movement, build and heritage. 3:22
  • Finds the £2,420 bracelet price amazing. 3:22
  • Appreciates such a well-engineered extension clasp at this price level. 4:19
Movementpositive
  • Acknowledges it is not one of Tudor's highest-performing Master Chronometer movements. 2:24
  • Believes the movement outperforms many rivals in its price range. 2:24
Bracelet & strappositive
  • Calls the bracelet a standout, near perfect and free of faux rivets. 3:51
  • Praises the thin, short T-fit clasp and its well-engineered on-the-fly extension. 4:19
  • Finds the leather-rubber hybrid strap a fair but less solid effort; prefers the woven strap's look. 4:48
  • Feels the watch suits the bracelet best, looking and feeling more solid. 4:48
Dialmixed
  • Dislikes the hour hand and would have preferred a snowflake hand. 5:17
  • Would have preferred a triangle at 12, admitting a bias toward the Explorer. 5:17
  • Really likes the curvy numerals and their vintage feel. 5:45
Case & proportionspositive
  • Says the thickness feels like a Black Bay 58 rather than a Black Bay Pro. 1:26
  • Expects buyers to appreciate the 39mm size. 2:53
Wearabilitypositive
  • Disliked it in photos but found it felt good and solid on the wrist. 2:53
Finishing & buildpositive
  • Lists the solid build among the watch's strengths. 3:51
Originalitypositive
  • Praises the brand's heritage and history behind the model. 3:51
  • Credits Tudor with executing vintage styling well. 5:45
  • Notes the overall styling is very similar to the Rolex Explorer. 3:22
Compared with
  • Rolex Explorer 36mm: Very similar styling; the Ranger offers 39mm and is easier to buy.
  • Tudor Black Bay Pro: The Ranger feels closer to Black Bay 58 thickness than Black Bay Pro.

Watch on YouTube

Also covered by

Worn & Wound

A Belated Hands-On with the 39mm Tudor Ranger

ArticleHands-on reviewJul 2022Zach Weiss

PositiveRecommends

The reviewer handled the watch at its London launch and calls the 39mm Ranger a very successful model. It is refined in nearly every way over the 41mm, charmingly peculiar in design, fully brushed and well priced. The size feels somewhat redundant for Black Bay 58/Pro owners.

Suits: Owners of larger Black Bay/Pelagos, 39mm Explorer fans, newcomers wanting Tudor's in-house movement

Disclosure: Hands-on at launch event

Another review by this creator is counted instead: one vote per creator.

What the review says, point by point
Designpositive
  • Describes the watch as peculiar, owing to its large, poster-like numerals.
  • Enjoys the unusual numerals and snake-head hour hand as a charmingly odd look.
Dialpositive
  • Prefers the flat pad-printed matte dial for its vintage accuracy over upscale surrounds or textures.
  • Suggests the molded ceramic-lume markers from the Black Bay Pro could have added depth.
  • Considers the minimal dial text a good choice given the busy numerals.
  • Finds the huge numerals make the dial very legible.
Case & proportionspositive
  • Finds the new case compact and well-proportioned, with a footprint like the BB58.
  • Considers 39mm a great size for an all-purpose sports watch.
  • Feels the size is somewhat redundant for Black Bay Pro/58 owners and personally wanted about 37mm.
Finishing & buildpositive
  • Likes the full brushing as more fitting for a tool watch and less prone to showing scratches.
  • Calls the fully brushed steel execution exciting.
Wearabilitypositive
  • Found that it fit the reviewer's wrist ideally on the nylon strap.
  • Notes the large numerals give it a different, magnified presence compared with Black Bay models.
Bracelet & strappositive
  • Calls the bracelet's T-Fit clasp excellent.
Originalitypositive
  • Sees the Ranger as more unique intellectual property and a distinctively styled watch.
  • Appreciates that it stays faithful to the original 1960s design.
Valuepositive
  • Considers the price great compared with rivals such as the Omega Railmaster.
  • Notes it is refined in nearly every way over the 41mm at the same price.
Compared with
  • Omega Railmaster: Ranger is much cheaper; Railmaster starts closer to $5k.
  • Tudor Black Bay 58: Same footprint and fit; somewhat redundant for BB58 owners.
  • Rolex Explorer 124270: Ranger's numerals keep a human quality; Explorer's feel digital.
  • Tudor Ranger 41mm (2014): The 39mm is refined in nearly every way; the 41mm felt oversized.

Read on wornandwound.com

Watchfinder & Co.

Why Did Tudor Bring Back the Ranger? | Watchfinder & Co.

Video, 9 minReactionJul 2022

PositiveRecommends

The hosts see the new Ranger as the watch the 2014 version should have been, with a smaller case and in-house movement. They like its unfussy field-watch character and call it an obvious buy at the price, though one host prefers straps to Tudor's bracelet.

Suits: Buyers wanting a no-nonsense field watch rather than a dive watch

Not a review of the watch in hand (news, a guide or a reaction), so it isn't counted.

What they said, point by point
Designpositive
  • Likes the unfussy nature of a field or expedition watch. 3:29
  • Sees it as a pure watch without clutter, filling a gap in Tudor's lineup. 3:58
Case & proportionspositive
  • Considers the 39mm case, down from 41mm, the size the watch should have had in 2014. 2:01
Movementpositive
  • Feels the in-house MT5402 irons out the earlier model's ETA shortcoming. 2:01
Bracelet & strapmixed
  • Finds Tudor's steel bracelets a flat, overwhelming wall of grey steel. 4:53
  • Prefers the NATO strap, which breaks up the look and adds interest. 4:53
  • Calls the bracelet very good and likes the T-fit safety catch. 5:23
Valuepositive
  • Considers the price reasonable for the lower end of luxury watches. 4:53
  • Sees it as an obvious buy at a few thousand pounds for non-divers. 5:23
Originalitymixed
  • Appreciates the thread of heritage running through the Ranger name. 2:30
  • Suspects the anniversary tie-in was chosen after deciding to relaunch for sales reasons. 2:30
Compared with
  • Tudor Ranger (2014, 41mm): New version fixes the older model's oversized case and ETA movement.

Watch on YouTube

Monochrome

The Tudor Ranger Is Back, More Compact and Now With COSC Manufacture Calibre

ArticleNewsJul 2022Brice Goulard

Positive

Sees the new 39mm Ranger as a clearly stronger offering than its predecessor. The reviewer credits the more compact, balanced proportions, the retro dial charm and the COSC manufacture movement, and calls the price aggressive.

Suits: Those who preferred the old 39mm Rolex Explorer size and style

Not a review of the watch in hand (news, a guide or a reaction), so it isn't counted.

What the review says, point by point
Designpositive
  • Appreciates the stripped-back, ultra-focused tool-watch concept without extra functions or bezel.
Dialpositive
  • Feels the beige printing enhances the retro feel and adds charm.
  • Believes the smaller size and larger bezel partly fix the previous version's empty-looking dial.
Case & proportionspositive
  • Notes the fully satin-finished case gives it a true instrument look.
Movementpositive
  • Considers the MT5402 a strong mechanical upgrade offering more precision than the old ETA.
Valuepositive
  • Describes the pricing as aggressive.
Compared with
  • Tudor Heritage Ranger 79910: New model called a far stronger offering and corrects the old dial's emptiness.
  • Rolex Explorer 39mm: Ranger positioned as an alternative for fans of the old 39mm Explorer.

Read on monochrome-watches.com

Specifications

Reference
M79950-0001
Case
39mm, stainless steel (satin-brushed)
Thickness
12mm
Lug to lug
47.75mm
Movement
MT5402 (COSC) (automatic)
Power reserve
70 hours
Water resistance
100m
Crystal
domed sapphire
Bracelet or strap
three-link steel bracelet with folding clasp and T-fit safety catch
Announced
July 2022
List price (US)
$3,050US launch price $3,050 on steel bracelet (July 2022, per aBlogtoWatch)

Creator Consensus is built only from what reviewers said. Prices, retailers and any commercial relationship never affect it. How consensus works